Comments (Page 463)

Torovosaurus wins due to it have so many differento weapons at its disposal

55-45 Torvo

Interesting translations.Return to the park sounds interesting..........

Haha very funny Raptor... Now if you don't mind I have to go puke now....

I guess I'll go lay down and rethink my whole life...

Well everyone's dries at some point........

I just think that theropods were more durable then most mammalian carnivores At parity. I was going to do another on how durable other dinosaur groups are but you already did that. And I agree that reptiles have a stronger immunity system them mammals and same was said for dinosaur.honest to god my opinion uis dinosaurs>>>>>>>>>>>mammals in overall durability. I don't see many extreme cases of them surviving major trauma. The only ones I do see are flukes or people helped them. In dinosaurs a lot if the time the bones will be broken then healed Wich means they lived rough lives and wre quite durable. The only reason we don't see this all the time is because dinosaur fossils are rare.

I agree with Carnosaur here, you can't base off footprints on making speculations on dinosaurs, let alone new species! I'm not stating it is impossible, but it's not likely.

And I always loved Megalosaurus! :D

Yes, I know right! I mean, water's dangerous, 100% of the people who drank water at least once in their lifetime have been reported to die!

Coincidence? I think not...

That is not limitate to dinosaurs. In fact, everything of that happends in modern days too, predators are very used to survive wounds, even bad ones, and it is the same for herbivores.

If you mean a stronger immunitary system, then I agree, because they could have had it, being reptiles.

Otherwise, it is common for animals, predators especially to be endurable. Nothing out of context with dinosaurs too.

Your welcome!!!

RAPTOR-401 - Hahaha! That's amazing! Thank you so much for sharing this, you've made my night that much better! :)

I'd rather say that all dinosaurs were extremely durable.  

For example, an Edmontosaurus that was discovered had several broken tail vertebrae because a T-rex bit down.  And yet this one individual escaped with its life, and the vertebrae healed.  But the bite wound itself would have been deadly enough if it had been a mammal.

funny how the trex looks similar with the trex head sold in oxmox studio

http://www.studiooxmox.com/trex_head/trex_giant_oxmox.html

thanks:)

Fences of all security

Two interesting creatures for sure, provided Ceratopsipes is legit that is. 

TYRANT KING - Very compelling! I'd actually never heard of Ceratopsipes; what a very interesting premise - a ceratopsian of such immense size! Thank you ever so much for sharing this with us! :)

X_PADEN_X - How very interesting! Thank you so much for the translations; I was curious as to what their meanings were! Personally, I'd like to see posters displaying each of the dinosaurs that will be presented within the film - perhaps just their eye and  small amount of their head to tease their appearance! :)

Thanks for translating this.

Wich is were I normally see it.

Yeah, I doubt the D-Rex  or whatever it's called now will be revealed at all throughout the marketing. Teased yeah but not fully revealed.

I am not sure about this animal but, I am being optimistic about it:) do you agree with the trike and ceratopsipes biteforcers?

^Agreed

Ceratopsipes is based off of footprints. And that right there, is a reason enough for us not to take it as a valid species. Footprints that have been in the ground for millenia are prone to erosion, walls caving in, etc. This would distort the prints, making it smaller/ larger then they really are. Of course, there are proponents for Footprints representing valid species, and for the sake of it, we might as well compare it with Triceratops.

Triceratops foot = 50 cm wide
Ceratopsipes foot = 80 cm wide

The foot prints of up to 0.5 m were associated with 5-6 ton triceratops.
So if we assume isometry, we get (0.8/0.5)^3*5 to 6= 20.5 to 24.6 tons. Which is indeed a massive animal, but again i'd be rather cautious in viewing this as a legitamite species.

Megalosaurus is a waste basket taxon, but the remains that have actually been attributed to it are indeed 27-30 feet in length, and perhaps 1.5 - 2 tons in weight. It's one of the first dinosaurs ever discovered( Iguanodon being the first) and it sure as hell is a pretty neat animal, one of the ones that got me interested in paleontology

I doubt Universal and Trevorrow would reveal the D-Rex this early in the game. Looks like it's a T-Rex redesign. Which is fine by me.

yeah it looks very much the same. looks like they just they just rented one for the event

Here's the Prehistoric Times T-rex:

http://www.statueforum.com/showthread

The theory that the Pachycephalasuarus could headbutt others of its species. To be fair, it was very likely at the time but now with x-rays we can see that the dome was hollow, any impact with another pcahy would most likelywould have killed it.

Interesting. Nice translations Paden. 

Torvosaurus wins at max since it is a bit bigger. Though at parity I say 50-50 since they have similar builds and similar bite forces. Though torvo's arms may prove useful.at minimum sizes torvo also wins due to reason I already stated.

WOW...looks totally amazing!

@Primal king

Yeah, Most of us are torn inbetween if its real or not. It is lacking a lot of the Famed "D-rex" Qualities, And personally... It should be Freightening to look at... This seems to lack the Nightmarish qualities we were promised.

The one at SDCC Was a let down, Or I think so. 

This does have some of the Demonus qualities, Like the Feathers, The Ridges near the eyes... But I wouldn't jump the gun on calling this D-rex quite yet.

The one with the Question mark, Is just a Rex. It looks more so like one of the ones from the Chaos Effect line.

Due to it's colour scheme. Or, Atleast I'd say so. 

One of the green underlined ones is mostlikely a Spino, A smaller cheaper one, To counter the larger more expensive electronic one. 

The higher one, Is most Likely a Raptor? Maybe even a Dilo.

Personally, I'm releaved to see that they have so many New Molds! The last JP Line was all repaints. 

I still see some Repaints here but, That was Inevitable. 

Nice translations! Anyways, thanks for them! And I really don't KNOW IF THAT'S D-Rex. We got a look at the JW Rex in SDCC, so that's probaly not a Rex, although it does look very similar with some raptor-ish qualities.

Awesome...

Sure as hell wish I had paid more Attention in French class Now... I can only make out a few words... And thats it...

Stay in school kids.

Good to know this is Confirmed JW!

Possible D-rex?

How very fantastic! I wonder if that image is of the D-Rex? Regardless, it's definately working to get me extremely excited for the film! :)

I like this. And, to be honest, I beleive Torvosaurus was about 40 ft long based on the specimen from Europe. If we are going off of that, then maybe 70-30, Torvo favor. If we aren't, then more around 55-45 Z-rex favor. Its a freakin tyrannosaur man, it lived with Tarbosaurus! It hunted Ankhlosaur type dinosaurs! Its big! Torvosaurus can and still does hold its own, so yeah. Those odds sound good.

CARNOSAUR - This was very fun to read! Hmm, I'd have to side with Torvosaurus on this one; the overall robust nature of the animal, in my opinion, lends it a solid fighting edge! Thank you ever so much for presenting this! :)

DINOBOY22 - How very neat! I'm as of yet uncertain if that image is a legitimate representation of D-Rex - but I certainly hope it is! That animal is both stunning and quite savage in aspect! Thank you so very much for sharing this with us! :)

ULTRA PREDATOR - What an incredibly fun chapter! I greatly enjoy the reference to the first of the Greecian Titans, Cronus - very compelling! Thank you ever so much for sharing this with us!