Two of the greatest animals ever!

Ceratopsipes is based off of footprints. And that right there, is a reason enough for us not to take it as a valid species. Footprints that have been in the ground for millenia are prone to erosion, walls caving in, etc. This would distort the prints, making it smaller/ larger then they really are. Of course, there are proponents for Footprints representing valid species, and for the sake of it, we might as well compare it with Triceratops.

Triceratops foot = 50 cm wide
Ceratopsipes foot = 80 cm wide

The foot prints of up to 0.5 m were associated with 5-6 ton triceratops.
So if we assume isometry, we get (0.8/0.5)^3*5 to 6= 20.5 to 24.6 tons. Which is indeed a massive animal, but again i'd be rather cautious in viewing this as a legitamite species.

Megalosaurus is a waste basket taxon, but the remains that have actually been attributed to it are indeed 27-30 feet in length, and perhaps 1.5 - 2 tons in weight. It's one of the first dinosaurs ever discovered( Iguanodon being the first) and it sure as hell is a pretty neat animal, one of the ones that got me interested in paleontology

I am not sure about this animal but, I am being optimistic about it:) do you agree with the trike and ceratopsipes biteforcers?

TYRANT KING - Very compelling! I'd actually never heard of Ceratopsipes; what a very interesting premise - a ceratopsian of such immense size! Thank you ever so much for sharing this with us! :)

Two interesting creatures for sure, provided Ceratopsipes is legit that is. 

thanks:)

I agree with Carnosaur here, you can't base off footprints on making speculations on dinosaurs, let alone new species! I'm not stating it is impossible, but it's not likely.

And I always loved Megalosaurus! :D