Jurassic World Movies

Top 10 Largest Theropods - Update

Locked20224 Views237 Replies
Forum Topic

Gigadino

MemberCompsognathusNov-08-2014 7:14 PM

I'm back, and since there have been a lot of new things during last months, I think it's time to update my top 10 largest Theropods list. You may find some big surprises:

#1. Tyrannosaurus rex

Everybody's favourite meat eater. Called "the absolute wardlord of the Earth" by New York Times in 1905, it's the most famous dinosaur in this list. This guy is pretty big: the largest specimen in called FMHN PR2081, or "Sue", and it's the largest good Theropod specimen: it was around to 3.5 meters tall, with a lenght of 12.3 m. This guy wasn't the longest meat-eaters but, due to its massive built, it was likely among the heaviest. Estimates for "Sue" range from as little as 5.6 t to over 9.5 t. Hartman recently proposed a lower estimate, wich puts this animal at over 8 t. It can beat any other Theropods in my list in terms of weight and since this ranking is about the largest (=heaviest), it earned the first place.

#2, #3, #4: Mapusaurus rosae, Giganotosaurus carolinii, Carcharodontosaurus saharicus

The three largest Carcharodontosaurids are very similar in size, so they share a common place.

 

Mapusaurus is often thought to be just 10-11 m long. Actually, that's just a myth. Coria & Curria, Mapusaurus's describers, mentioned some specimens comparable in size with Giganotosaurus carolinii's holotype. There is also a specimen wich is 110 % the size of Giganotosaurus carolinii's holotype. That's just a piubic shaft, so we cannot give a precise estimate for this animal. If it was really 110 % the size of G.carolinii's holotype, it was 13.6 m long, but as this is a fragmentary specimen, we don't know if it really was that large. A wiser 12-13 m range is better for large Mapusaurus specimens. A weight range similar to that of Giganotosaurus is also feasible.

 

One of the well know guys is Giganotosaurus carolinii. This south american Carcharodontosaurid was discovered back in 1993, and it was one of the largest Theropods. The first specimen is a uncomplete skeleton (around to 50-70 % complete), wich is longer than "Sue" (at 12.2-12.4 m), but lighter (at 6-7 t). A second specimen has been discovered. It's a piece of dental, and it's estimated to be 6.5 % larger than the first specimen. If it was really that big, it was 13.2 m long, but again this specimen is very fragmentary, and precise estimates aren't safe. A 12-13 m range for this specimen is pretty good. Weight estimates ranges from 5 to 14 t, but something like 7-8 t is supported by most of the paleontologist.

Carcharodontosaurus saharicus is the most fragmentary of the three. It's been discovered back in 1927, but only recently we realized how big it really was. Its size strongly depends on its proportions: if it was small-headed, like Acrocanthosaurus, well, the largest speimen, SMG-din 1, would have been a huge behemot, at almost 14 meters long. However, a such build is pretty unlikely, as Acrocanthosaurus is a less derivated Carcharodontosaurid. The much closer Giganotosaurus is a big-headed Theropod, so a big-headed build is likely for Carcharodontosaurus saharicus, too. If it was big headed, it would end up between 12 and 13 meters. Again, 12-13 m is the best range for a such fragmentary beast. A weight similar to that of other giant Carcharodontosaurids is likely.

#5: Spinosaurus aegyptiacus

Once regarded as the biggest Theropod, something changed during last months. In fact, Ibrahim et. al proposed a new recostruction based on new materials. This time, the animal was much closer to the ground than before, and it had a much less deep chest, thus the animal would be lighter. There is no official estimate for the new recostruction, but Andrea Cau mentioned a 6-7 t figure, wich would fit perfectly for a such gracile animal. Spinosaurus aegyptiacus still holds the record as longest Theropod though, at 12-15 meters long.

#6: Tyrannotitan chubuitensis

This guy may not be that well know among the public, but it would definitely deserve to: it's got an epic name, rivalling Tyrannosaurus rex itself. Joking aside, Cau called it "the Cinderella of Giant Theropods", because it's often forgotten, when it's the largest Theropod know from good specimens along with T.rex. Its lenght was estimated at 12.2 m, and that's the only estimate I found. There's even a 13 meters one by GSP, but seems to be based on a 13 m Giganotosaurs holotype, wich is doubtfull. The largest specimen is around as big as Giganotosaurus holotype - so, between 6 and 7 t - making it one of the largest Theropod.

#7: Deinocheirus mirificus

This guy is a new entry. Once an unsolved puzzle, today the most depicted dinosaur on Deviant Art. Only recently we realized how much strange (and big) it was; we've new materials, wich includes two new very good preserved skeletons. This animal was in the 6-6.5 t range, according to new estimates based on new specimens, so it was almost as big as Spinosaurus. Its lenght is measured at 11 m long, thus it was pretty long as well. It may hold the record as the tallest Theropod, at over 4 meters tall.

#8: Acrocanthosaurus atokensis

This guy is easily recognizable due to its muscolar ridge on its back. Even though it isn't always mentioned, it's earned its place here, as it's one of the largest Theropod, as well as apex predator of its ecosystem. The largest specimen is called "Fran", and it's indeed pretty big; it's measured to reach 11,5 meters long over the curves. Weight estimates rage between 5 and 6 t, even though Mazzetta proposed a higher weight of 7 t. Cau said that this Theropod was much more gracile than Tyrannosaurus rex, so a 5-6 t range can be good.

#9: Therizinosaurus cheloniformis

This guy isn't mentioned everywhere, but it should. It's the most massively built Theropod, even more than Tyrannosaurus rex, thus it was among the heaviest. This guy is the only herbivore in my ranking, but it was a Theropod, so I included it. I've found a lot of estimates for this animal, but a 10 meters estiamte for lenght appears to be good. This animal could have weighted around to 5 t. It may have been the tallest Theropod, only rivalled by Deinocheirus.

#10: Suchomimus tenerensis

You weren't expecting to find it here, were you? Actually, even though it's often forgotten, it definitely deserves to be there. Suchomimus's type specimen is a sub adult, yet it's very big: it was originally estimated at 11 meters, but GSP later gave a 9.5 m estimate. However, hartman recently made a skeletal of this specimen, wich is 12 meters long. And it even wasn't an adult. Weight estimates rage from 4 to over 5 tonnes, thus a 4-5 t range can be good.

237 Replies

Gigadino

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 6:01 AM

The problem is we have just a small sample of specimens of some of the guys there, like Giganotosaurus. We cannot say what was Giganotosaurus average, it may have been 7 t or even as huge as 10 t.

Hiphopananomus

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 7:47 AM

Nice list! 

Although I myself few giganotosaurus as a larger dinosaur then Mapusaurus but that's just me. 

 

P.S my reason for this is because while Mapusaurus is Possibly (not confirmed) longer then giganotosarurus, Giganotosaurus appears more robust, which in turn would make it heavier.

"Somewhere on this island is the greatest predator that ever lived. Second greatest predator must take him down."Roland Tembo"

"Jurassic park: The Lost World"

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 7:55 AM

Based on these skeletals(the first by Ibrihim and the second by Hartman), Spinosaurus looks pretty gracile...

 

 

But being gracile can be good in an aquatic lifestyle. It'd make the animal faster overall since it'd have less mass to move through the water.

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Gigadino

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 8:43 AM

Hiphopananomus, it's hard to determinate wich animal is the animals are based on incomplete specimens. We don't really know if Mapusaurus is more slender, as the femoral that are 83 and 87 % the thickness of Giganotosaurus' holotype comes from anima, wich likely were smaller than Giganotosaurus' holotype, so I'd assume an equal bulk, and therefore an equal size, at least as long as we have just fragmentary specimens.

Carnosaur

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 8:44 AM
@ gigadino this is the thing though, your list would be rendered void due to this fact...seeing how you claimed averages & now you're negating it. @rexfan those aren't skeletals...they're digital renderings via 3D scan. hartman tweaked it to elongate the ribcage, that's it. no one has done a skeletal on the new finds. Also, you can't tell how robust something is from a dorsal view...a full frontal view would suffice. unfortunately, there are none at the moment. Saltwater xrocs are robust animals, as well as american alligators & black caiman. Soyth American Giant river otters also jump to mind. yet they are perfectly suited to the water via semi aquatic adaptation.

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

Gigadino

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 8:50 AM

Where did I claim that those are averages? I never clamed that this list is base on averages.

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 9:13 AM

Ok, so technically I used the wrong term, but still. For one thing, Hartman also elongated the legs a bit. It's not quite as quadrupedal. Also, while a frontal view does help in determinging if an animal is robust, a side view can also help to a degree. These show how shallow the ribcage is. You can't fit a whole lot in that somewhat shallow area, so there'd be less weight there.

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Tyrant king

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 11:53 AM

Well, giga you should have specified. And you should use averages in size lists cause it is more commonly used and better to understand.

rexfan,  many aquatic/semi aquatic animals are quite bulky. Spinosaurus certainly would be no exception.

long time no see HPP.

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 12:00 PM

And TK, many aquatic/semi-aquatic animals aren't, so Spinosaurus certainly could be too. Mosasaurs for example were apex predators, but had somewhat slender designs...

 

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Tyrant king

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 12:07 PM

I am ranking about semi aquatic. Many semi aquatic animals such as crocs are quite bulky and since spinosaurua is semi aquatic and clislet related to crocs it eouldwould be a fairly robust animal.

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 12:10 PM

Not based on the new skeleton it wouldn't be. Keep in mind this new one is 40 percent complete(not too bad), but combined with Stromers and any other fragments, it would be 60 percent complete. Now, that's not an exact science, but it'd helpful.

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Gigadino

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 12:39 PM

As I've already explained, using averages isn't wiser, as we don't know the average size ofa couple of animals from this list.

Tyrant king

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 12:44 PM

I completely understand. But the maxses are even more unknown.

Gigadino

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 2:03 PM

Not really, when we have just 2 specimens, like in Giganotosaurus. We cannot size what average size was with 2 specimens, but we can say what max. confirmed lenght was (by giving a range, wich includes even smaller adults size)

Something Real

MemberTyrannosaurus RexNov-11-2014 5:42 PM

GIGADINO, REX FAN 684 and TYRANT KING - Out of curiosity, since I know the three of you are quite knowledgeable within the field of paleontology, what is the largest known specimen of Carcharodontosaurus? :)

Carnosaur

MemberCompsognathusNov-11-2014 5:59 PM
@Rexfan, yes but bigger species of mosasaurs weighed 7+ tons. mosasaurs in general were massive creatures despite their serpentine-esque build. anaconda are the worlds largest snakes, and they're semi aquatic. need i remark their ribcage is elongated as well? as a general rule of thumb, semi aquatic animals > terrestrial relatives in terms of mass at equal lengths. e.g. green anaconda > african rock python, ornate water monitor > savannah monitor. elongated ribcage doesn't mean an animal is gracile. @ gigadino specifications in regards to your figures there would've been nice, as your post implies higher mass figures as average in some theropods here. SR, even though you didn't ask me, a well rounded estimate for sereno's C. saharicus is ~12.8 m; 7 tons.

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

Gigadino

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 3:39 AM

The largest Carcharodontosaurus is SMG din-1. Its size is unknow, as it's really fragmentary, but, if we assume that it was big-headed like Giganotosaurus, I estimated it at 12,4-12,6 m long, so, considering the margin of error, the individual variability etc a good size range is 12-13 m and 7-8 t If it was small-headed like Acrocanthosaurus, it could reach 13,9 m long (so 13-14 m), but a such build isn't so likely, as Acrocanthosaurus is less close than Giganotosaurus to Carcharodontosaurus, plus Acrocanthosaurus wasn't a derivated Carcharodontosaurid, while Giganotosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus were. Carnosaur, I specified somewhere that I was talking about max sizes. For example, when I talked about T.rex, I said 'estimates for Sue', wich is the largest T.rex. However, I'll change it, and I'll write nax sizes.

Something Real

MemberTyrannosaurus RexNov-12-2014 5:04 AM

CARNOSAUR - Thank you so very much! I was having trouble with the estimates online and yours falls within the spectrums very nicely! I greatly appreciate this data! :)

GIGADINO - The information you've provided is quite nice! I like the comparisons you made between other animals! :)

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 12:53 PM

Carnosaur, snakes may be somewhat robust in someways, but they have to have extra muscles along their bodies to move because they don't have arms or legs. Spinosaurus did, so it's body overall could be more gracile(and mosasaurs were fully aquatic and could simply swim).

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Spinosaurus Rex

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 3:09 PM

I dont remember it being proven to have an elongated ribcage in the first place, so whats the point in that being your arguement towards why you think it was a pushover? 

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 3:38 PM

Never said it was a pushoever, but the new skeleton(which can't be denied) suggests it...

 

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Spinosaurus Rex

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 3:57 PM

Yes... the new "mishap" suggests it.

Tyrant king

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 4:08 PM

@ spino rex, what does that mean?

rex fan, the real spino had longer limbs and could rear up to slash. and it dosent look like a pushover to me.

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 4:38 PM

TK, it means he's in denial.

 

And TK, Hartman did a skeleton model(bottom) in which he gave it slightly longer legs...

 

 

And, as I said, it isn't a pushover.

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexNov-12-2014 4:50 PM

*grabs popcorn* 

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Spinosaurus Rex

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 4:56 PM

Gracile is the definition of pushover i will add. I do not agree with this thing one bit nor your assumption, so ill leave it at that.

Tyrant king

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 4:57 PM

well i guess i am in denial because i dont trust he new models. there is no true,legit evidence to back it up. and you did say that the new model suggests it was a pushover. but i am not trying to fight.

 

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 4:59 PM

A 6-7 ton animal is not a pushover. Go up to any elephant and see if you can overpower it. 

 

Also, considering the new material is 40 percent complete, and when combined with the holotype and other finds it measures 60 percent complete, I'd call that legit evidence.

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexNov-12-2014 5:00 PM

If I'm not mistaken, a pushover would be incapable of defending itself. With those claws, it's sheer physical size, and possibly the ability to change the sail's colour, Spino would be no pushover. Gracile, perhaps. Pushover, hell no. 

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Spinosaurus Rex

MemberCompsognathusNov-12-2014 5:01 PM

6-7 tons IS a pushover in terms of the largest carnivores as you put it, i stand at 12 tons average.

Add A Reply
Latest Images
Community Stats
This Jurassic World Movies community is part of the Scified network. Scified hosts a network of online fan-site communities containing 405,846 posts by 48,226 members (7 are online now). The Jurassic World: Rebirth Forum is the most recently active forum. The latest Forum topic added was: Jurassic World 4 hits theaters in 1 year! Are you excited?
VIPWhat are VIP?AdminModeratorSpecial TitleMember
Jurassic Park/World Jurassic Park Fandom
Latest Features
Jurassic World Movies Forums
Jurassic World: Rebirth
Jurassic World: Rebirth Discuss the new Jurassic World film by Gareth Edwards!
Dinosaurs
Dinosaurs Talk About Dinosaurs
Jurassic World Fan Artwork
Jurassic World Fan Artwork Share your Jurassic World fan art here
Jurassic World
Jurassic World Discuss Jurassic World Here
Jurassic Park
Jurassic Park Discuss Jurassic Park 1 - 3
Jurassic Park Games
Jurassic Park Games Talk About Jurassic Park Games
Jurassic World Merchandise
Jurassic World Merchandise Discuss Jurassic World merchandise here
Hot Forum Topics
New Forum Topics
Highest Forum Ranks Unlocked
Hydra
Hydra » Triceratops
80% To Next Rank
Latest Jurassic Fandom Activity

JurassicWorld-Movies.com is a fan website dedicated to all things Jurassic Park and Jurassic World! This website was developed, created and is maintained by Jurassic Park fans and is not officially affiliated with Universal Pictures, Amblin Entertainment or any other respective owners of Jurassic World IP.

© 2024 Scified.com
Sign in
Use your Scified Account to sign in


Log in to view your personalized notifications across Scified!

Transport To Communities
Alien Hosted Community
Cloverfield Hosted Community
Godzilla Hosted Community
Jurassic World Hosted Community
Predator Hosted Community
Aliens vs. Predator Hosted Community
Latest Activity
Forums
Search Scified
Trending Articles
Blogs & Editorials
Featured Forum Discussions
Forums & Community
Sci-Fi Movies
Help & Info