Comments (Page 67)

Yeah, you're right about all those things, I just didn't think about them. I guess you'd make a better reviewer than I would XD. Anyways, I was actually wondering about  the camouflage thing, but I'm guessing it's so they can find it again so they don't have another Jurassic World Indominus river scene. Other than that, that's pointless. Want to know what's more pointless? HAVING A GUN POINTED AT YOUR ENEMY AND SENDING A DINOSAUR TO KILL IT BY PRESSING A BUTTON LITERALLY RIGHT NEXT TO THE TRIGGER!!! That would have a very niche function, like you're entire crew is out of ammo but you have an Indoraptor. That would be the only point that I could actually see in that, but then they'd shoot it dead because, as you mentioned, it wouldn't stand much of a chance against it. Also, they made it WEAKER than a Velociraptor. It kinda got wrecked by Blue, it was covered in scratches and wounds but Blue didn't have a single scratch on her. For your twelfth thing, yeah, that the same thing they did in Godzilla 2014 with the Kaiju, but I personally preferred that movie over this one. Wait, did I just say I like a movie that isn't Jurassic Park BETTER than a Jurassic Park movie?!!! Wow, they've just done ****ed up if even I like a film that isn't Jurassic Park more than it. Also, on the subject of Blue, she kinda was useless, only there to lead to showing some of the humor Chris Pratt is known for when he was getting Rexy's blood. In fact, Rexy was pretty useless in this movie too! Also, I kinda always thought in JW "please stop emphasizing Blue, now I can already tell all the other ones are going to die and/or turn on him". The movie would have been MUCH more interesting if all the raptors were given a unique personality, which is something that Alteori does in her POV very well. Especially in the one where Charlie dies, made me actually like Charlie for more than her cool patterning (WHICH YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE IN THE MOVIE!). Anyways, I'm not going to bash on JW, it was basically on par with the other JP sequels but a bit more boring, in my opinion. JWFK on the other hand.... maybe I should make a topic on that.... oh wait... I just hope that the third will be better, but if this series will be like the original Jurassic Park trilogy, then the third is going to be debatably worse or better, and have a REALLY controversial fight that ends in less than 30 seconds, like a Carnotaurus pack killing Rexy. REVENGE FOR WHAT YOU DID TO US IN FALLEN KINGDOM!!!!

TheLazyFish You're welcome for my feedback. 

Also, a few other things I thought about:

Tenth, just like in the first Jurassic World film, Blue is just useless until the final confrontation with the hybrid. Did we really need it?

Eleventh, the Indoraptor is not bulletproof (at least, not completely). It died to being pierced by a skeleton cast, so what chance would it have against armour piercing bullets? Its head was probably bulletproof, but not its whole body. And if this was a super-weapon, why would it not be allowed to have camouflage, thermal-radiation detection, the ability to communicate with other dinosaurs (Can you imagine how epic that would be if we got a scene in which Rexy and the Carnotaurus are being given orders by the Indoraptor?), and higher intelligence instead of just making it chase a laser only slightly better than a house cat? And no, I don't want the excuse that it's a prototype, because that DOESN'T work  when it comes to this.

Twelvth, I still hate that the dinosaurs were just pushed to the background for human characters that I wasn't even interested in. I just went for the dinosaur action, and the scenes on Isla Nublar, not what we got.

And there's still more. Just not sure when I'll talk about it. (Insert my forum signature here.)

Thanks!

Really good, since it's a short rewrite the tone thing isn't changed, but other than that it's really good, much better than the actual movie. My main gripe is that you didn't confirm that the Indoraptor DOESN'T smile into the camera...... but if he kills Wheatley AFTER he breaks out, THEN THE SMILE SCENE PROBABLY DIDN'T HAPPEN!!!! THANK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!! As Ultrazero mentioned, I would have personally taken out that clone thing, but to each their own. Poor Styggi..... Really great rewrite, would have paid to have seen this in theaters! YAY LOWERY!!!!!!!

Would’ve made a few different changes but overall a good rewrite. 

I really like your rewrite. Only thing I would have done differently is not have Maisie be a clone. Other than that, this was a good read.

Yeah, I know you're usually on the Godzilla forums, I've seen you there before. Kinda ironic you're more on the Godzilla forums but you signature is an Allosaurus hahaha. All joking aside, I didn't brush up on those because I didn't remember, the last time I watched the movie was in theaters, hence the disclaimer that I haven't watched it in a while. Anyways, I wanted to brush up on the Pachyrhinosaurus/Sinoceratops thing, but didn't really feel the need to, I was sleepy and rambled on too much already. I also really hated Rexy's roar now that I remember it, I liked it better in the first trailer. Then I think it messed up, but I may be remembering it wrong. It kinda ruined one of the coolest moments of the film. As inaccurate as the Carnotaurus is in JWFK, I prefer it over the huge, bulky Carno of Dinosaur. It's meant to be slim and, kinda like the one in ARK. I really prefer the Isle one though, that kinda captures the essence of the horrible turn, cheetah, horrible attack of Carnotaurus. Also, I had no idea about that being the reason they changed Pachyrhinosaurus to Sinoceratops, that infuriated me when I read that. Why would they need to do that, Jurassic Park is enough to do that already! I really doubt adding a Dinosaur that a lot of people I know don't even know about or even realize its from China once I say its name would lure in a larger audience. I liked they chose a more obscure genus, but it doesn't really look like a Sinoceratops, looks more like a slightly remodeled, chunky Pachyrhinosaurus. Still looks absolutely adorable though, especially in Jurassic World Evolution. I really miss Rexy's Jurassic Park roar. That made her feel huge, imposing, and real, as I mentioned before. I agree on Brachiosaurus' return being weird, and the fact it was never brought up in Jurassic World. On the subject on that, I didn't really bring up Compies and Dimorphs because I didn't really care, was sleepy, forgot about Dimorphs not being there, and just assumed we didn't see them like Baryonyx, Allosaurus, Carnotaurus, Sinoceratops, etc in JW. I did hear the theory about Stygimoloch being a juvenile Pachycephalosaurus, but I never heard about it being confirmed. Was it actually confirmed? Last I checked it was still under debate as of last year I think. Allosaurus did look cool, but just had the usual pronated hands, lack of feathers, and a bit of an elongated skull for an Allosaurus. By the way, you watch Alteori too?!! I never saw that video, only started watching her this year basically, going to have to look for that one. Also, I don't remember seeing the Pteranodon on the mainland, so sorry, just my faulty memory. But really, Pterosaurs are very fragile and even if some survive the flight from the Americas to Eurasia, Africa, or Australia, they'd be easily killed. They have incredibly fragile structures to reduce weight for flying, kinda like how Velociraptors have weak bones that can be broken from a strong, professional player's baseball bat swing, though for different reasons. So sorry that I forgot to cover most of this, I don't really have the best of memory. Other than that, I just felt no need to cover some of this stuff. Also, I thought they didn't pronate the hands of the Carnotaurus in JWFK, only in the toy they did that. It was only after you brought it up that I decided to look it up, and apparently they DID pronate its hands. That sucked. I wish they went with the novel version of Carnotaurus if they were going to make it inaccurate. Then it would have been AWESOME. To be honest, it got the better end of the cameo stick compared to poor Ceratosaurus. At least they gave it the right number of horns XD. Also, CERATOSAURUS FOR LIFE XD!!!!!! Well, besides Spino...... and Megalodon....... and maybe a few other non dinos...... Anyways, thanks for the feedback, made me realize stuff about the film I forgot about. Hopefully people reading this will read your comment, brings up some other stuff that they messed up in the film.

TheLazyFish 

First of all, yes, I am new to this part of the Scified fandoms, but I know Xenotaris from the Godzilla Scified fandom.

Second, I'm pretty sure Pteranodons did get rescued (Otherwise we wouldn't have an after-credits scene of them "nesting" [because who even knows what they were doing] on the small Eiffel Tower in Las Vegas.), so yes, we do have to worry about them.

Third (and a Youtuber named Alteori said the same thing, but I repeat what she said here), the Indoraptor would bite itself, but after it feels the pain of it biting itself, it would stop to prevent any more self-harm.

Fourth, I'm surprised that you didn't bring up the return of the Compsognathus, or the sudden "disappearance" of the Dimorphodons between the 2015 film and this one (even though they are listed as 'endangered' on the website[s], not 'extinct'), OR how they only did a sound effect cameo for the Dilophosaurus and basically trolled us by having Rexy attack the guys at the beginning (which by the way I was surprised you didn't talk about your opinion on that part of the film).

Fifth, I hate that they even considered Stygimoloch an actual species to begin with, since it's already been proven that it's a juvenile Pachycephalosaurus.

Sixth, I didn't like the design of the Carnotaurus or Baryonyx in this film, and to be honest, I would choose the Carnotaurus design from Disney's Dinosaur (2000) or from ARK: Survival Evolved over the design they chose here (the Mattel toy makes it worse, especially turning the already weird arms and claws into human baby hands), and I would also choose the ARK design for the Baryonyx over the design they had here as well. (I'm okay with the design choices for the Allosaurus, Sinoceratops, and the "Stygimoloch".)

Seventh, I saw this film with my younger brother, and we both felt the same way about one thing: the Brachiosaurus' return was very underutilized, "cameo-ed", and extremely disappointing. I got emotional with the Brachiosaurus death scene, but they didn't have to (and they shouldn't have at all) have it be the SAME Brachiosaurus that we see in the first one (the first ever full-reveal dinosaur on screen in the first Jurassic Park).

Eighth, I hate how they said the Sinoceratops was going to be a Pachyrhinosaurus at first, only for them to change it to Sinoceratops at the last minute (which is obvious in the Mattel toy) just for some sort of "appeal-ment" to Chinese audiences. I feel like "Mr." Henry Wu's appearance would've been enough, but no, they just had to ruin the hopes and dreams of a bunch of people and change it to Sinoceratops.

Ninth, I liked the new model for Rexy, and I was going to like her as a whole in this film, but then, I heard her roar in this film, and I WAS MAD! I feel like somebody messed up the audio during production or post-production, because it felt like I was hearing a bootleg version of Rexy's roar, even though I was in an OFFICIAL THEATER! They did a better job on the roar in the 2015 film than they did here, and to make it worse, the Mattel toy (or rather, toys) and the sneak peek trailer for Jurassic World: The Ride utilized the old roars on the new model better than the new roar did in the new model. Even on the Blu-Ray/DVD, in the final part when Rexy kills Mills, her roar is still too quiet (and this was with my TV's volume being a third of it's highest volume, which is basically 30-40/100). So not even in the DVD or Blu-Ray is the audio of the roar good, so somebody messed up big time, because I was disappointed.

And there's a whole lot more I can go over, but I can't right now. However, if you need me, I'm more active on the Godzilla Scified fandom (godzilla-movies.com). That is all I have to say. You're welcome. And btw, this is my secondary account. My primary one is MinecraftDinoKaiju, hence my forum signature. You're welcome.

Yup, which is what it was (even though there was a short fight between a crippled Diplodocus and 2 Saurophaganax at the end) XD

BubbaGumpJr Totally. I agree.

You are? That sounds really cool! I'm looking forward to seeing it! If you change one thing, just make it so that the Indoraptor doesn't smile into the camera. I will be happy with it even if you change nothing else XD

I know a lot of people who hated Fallen Kingdom, which is why I'm working on a rewrite of it.

 Xenotaris

I guess it's just a matter of difference of opinion and perspective. I personally felt the CGI in Jurassic World had actually less depth than in Jurassic Park, and don't remember any animatronics from the the film, but once again just my opinion. Also, in Jurassic Park the CGI is kinda worse, but it actually feels like they're there, like you could reach out and touch them, even in the CGI scenes. In Jurassic World, it felt more like they were just in the movie, and not truly there. No wonder or amazement or anything, because they don't look like they're actually there. They look like they were just plastered onto the scene instead of actually moving, living, breathing in it like in Jurassic Park. Also, the fight scene in Jurassic Park looked better to me, the impacts were solid, and you could basically feel every jab to the neck and you felt the CRASH when the Velociraptor got thrown into the skeleton. In the Jurassic World fight scene, it just looks like jelly, like taking some jello and trying to slap it into each other. The fight was awesome, but didn't look solid or real. That's why I feel the CGI was better in Jurassic Park, because even when you could see through the Dinosaurs, it still looked like they were there, somehow. Even Jurassic Park 3 could kinda do this. The fight scene in JP3 was kinda like jelly, but you could still feel some of those hits and impacts, especially the infamous neck snap and even more so when the T-rex falls to the ground. In Jurassic World, you feel very little of it of it, and that is true to an extent in JW:FK. It's just my opinion, but I feel like in the first three, even Jurassic Park 3, you can get pulled into the movie, even after watching it seven times over (yes, I did that). In the new movies, I just couldn't really feel that. I never really felt attached to the characters besides Rexy and Blue, even then... The fight at the end of Jurassic World didn't pull me in because of the animation, but the fight itself and my hope that Rexy would survive. Jurassic Park had that throughout the whole thing. The situation in JW:FK is even worse, I only got really pulled in during the TRAILERS (and the Brachiosaurus scenes... poor thing.... but even then only for a moment). I got more pulled in by the trailers than I did most the movie, which may say more about me than the film, but still. Once again, just my opinion. I was trying to make a joke about the nuke thing, sorry if I was a bit unclear on that, changed it now to avoid future confusion. On the subject on the Stegosaurus, had it actually been explained or been more than a glance at the Stegosaurs, I'd be ok with that story, I'd praise it for being close to the novel, but since all we got was a passing glance and them having no part in the movie, I really didn't like it. I mean, Dr. Wu mentions it later when talking about how all the Dinosaurs were not like their original counterparts, but he never mentions intentions of messing with the genome of the Dinosaurs, mainly implying that the reason for the differences was because of the gaps in the genome. Then again, I guess that's just me. Once again, it's all just my opinion of the movie, I'm glad that you could like the movie more than I did. I still like the movie, but to me it's a hot mess compared to the rest of the films. Also, at least the Spinosaurus didn't smile into the camera XD

Well I completely disagree with your statements to the movie.

The Spinosaurus lacked personality in Jurassic Park III, it was nothing but a loud roaring idiot that killed T. rex only because Joe Johnson and Jack Horner wanted T. rex to be replaced and it was quite obvious that the Spinosaurus was a T. rex replacement to the point that it was repeating everything that the T. rex was doing but to a great effect because I'm bigger means I'm tougher but lack any originality and personality that the Rex has so i'm going to chase after the humans because i'm a big monster!

Contrary to what most say about the original two Jurassic Parks of having the best effects. It was quite obvious in both Jurassic Park and The Lost World which was the CGI model and which is the animatronic, Jurassic Park III got a little better at it by having the CGI dinosaurs in the background while having the animatronic dinosaurs in the foreground, Jurassic World was mostly CGI but pretty good CGI, and Fallen Kingdom they blended the animatronics with CGI so it wouldn't be obvious like the original jurassic park trilogy.

Also you answered your own rant about why the stegosauruses were more inaccurate, because INGEN engineered them that way, I mean Dr. Wu seems to have more power at Jurassic World than at Jurassic Park. Because Hammond isn't there to keep him in check.

Also why does everyone go with the freaking Nuke option to kill a bunch of animals?! You do know if you nuke any part of the united states to just kill off a few prehistoric animals, you'll end up killing off the rest of the unaffected population correct? Because wind will carry the fallout well beyond the blast zone so you'll end up doing more harm to the biosphere than the dinosaurs ever would.

Yeah, I know. Also, the dinosaur's name is Protoceratops, seen earlier in the fight. And it was later clarified that they weren't Protoceratops eggs, and were actually the Oviraptor's own eggs, but they couldn't change the name. Also, why did you put a link to a DoMyAssignmentForMe website? And I don't entirely understand everything you're saying, I'm sorry.

Np, it was your idea. Thanks for such a cool idea. I actually got to use Dinosaurs strictly from the same time and locale! Was pretty fun to write

Sorry, double post.

Thanks for the shoutout.

Well, this was 6 years ago, and usually people don't look up the scientists in a documentary. I kinda forgot how far back I went in the forum's history when I replied to this. The disclaimer was incredibly tiny and only on screen for a few seconds at the beginning. You basically needed a magnifying glass to read it. And some of them were trying to cast some doubt on this (mainly Rex Fan). Most of them have left the site as far as I know, which is really sad. Must have left because life got complicated. The person who posted this made the one post and left. In fact, I might not even be talking to you. You could have left in the time it took for me to notice your reply to this guy's post I accidentally brought back to life. Don't be deterred by this post if you're still here hybrid. Lord Vader (who was back then named Mr. Happy) might still be around, though the last time he was on was a few weeks before I joined the forums (I joined early February of this year, so he may come back). He's a good writer and pretty nice from what I've seen, but I've never actually talked to him myself. Most people were duped by this, and Lord Vader was 13 or 14 if I remember right. I was just a kid back when the doc came out, and many adults were duped too. Of course, almost everyone later found out the doc was a fake, though some (probably none of these people) still think it's real (le sigh). Wait, what was I talking about originally? Anyways, these are incredibly old posts, back when most people thought Spinosaurus held had typical Theropod legs and there was no confusion about it as there is today. If you want a better idea of what the forum is like you should read some of the newer posts people made, or some of the stories written by some of the people here. Lord Vader, Rex Fan, I Meme Everything, Alphadino65, and EmperorGorillaGodzilla have some really interesting stories and most, if not all, are pretty accurate, though some do require to not think about it with extreme logic. In fact, those last three people I mentioned are definitely still here, GG has a new story coming out this summer called Destiny (though it doesn't have anything to do with Dinosaurs, he has 4 different stories dealing with Dinosaurs, which may require some pre-reading of some Dino fights he made to fully understand, but you can get by without them). There are other writers from the Olden days you can find on this sight who were really good at writing fights and stories, like Deltadromeus (who I think left, but you can find his profile here with all his fights and stories) and Dino Fights, who left many years ago sadly. There's plenty of other stuff to read to, like Final Battle Royal, which has some of the best fights ever, and somehow didn't cause any major fighting. In fact, fights on this forum are rare, besides the two Jurassic World Wars which I have been trying to find for a couple months to little avail. The closest I can find were mini battles, a Spino v Carc skull debate which got really heated, but I don't believe that is one of the wars, it has to do with rex v spino, and they both happened prior to Jurassic World coming out. That leaves a two to three year gap to find them. Other than those listed, people on these forums rarely fight, it mainly happened in the early days of the forums. Only good things have happened since. So keep the fact that the forums have changed a lot in 6 years and that this was a time that almost everyone was duped by the documentary, when it was still new when you talk about how people believed this and about the forums. Wait, did that sound a bit hostile. Sorry if it did, not trying to be, and sorry that this comment is too long. If you ever read this.

Those sound awesome! And I'd get to work with smaller Carnivores, herbivores, Jurassic World, and Sauropods! Thanks man!

Velociraptor vs Oviraptor.

Dromaeosaurus pack vs Zuniceratops.

JW:  Allosaurus vs Metriacanthasaurus.

Intra-specific combat between sauropods during mating season.

This forum post and replies made me want to puke so much, god how can people think like this.

I guess I'll figure it out myself then XD

Yeah... can't argue with you there! Hahaha

What Jurassic World 3 needs isn't better animatronics, it needs a writer that can actually write a f**king movie. 

Actually, it's in Pacific Standard Time, so I guess it doesn't recognize other time zones

I posted this just after midnight.  The clock on this site is about 3 hours slow.

Why you do dis to me XD

Couldn't wait 3 more hours, could you XD

Did any of you click the link?  Cuz it was an April Fool's prank...

If they do end up doing this. Then they better not disappoint the audience like JP3. The franchise would be better off without another spinosaurus in the films. Heck, spinosaurus wasnt even mentioned in the last movie and various official websites had stated of its extinction. They’re really going to have to make some random excuse to add it back into the series. 

I hope that look will as same as the real one. I still think the old look is good enough but changing is fine. bullet force

How about making a cartoon about this for kids? It's another angle of Jurassic world for all ages.

_ 2 player games _

I love watching movies about Jura classic, it's so real and I feel like I'm living in that era. gta 5 cheats

Well dang that is gonna be cool to see!

^The length along the centra (which is shorter than over the curves) is the true length of the animal. That makes Sue 12.3 meters and Scotty 12.1.

@I Meme Everything

More than using femoral circumference, Scotty is only around 65% complete, so comparing it to Sue's skeleton means taking into account a greater margin of error.

For the 13m estimate, that's a rounded figure AND an "over the curves" measurement of the body in a presumed neutral stance, which normally isn't used.  The "over the curves" body length for Sue is 12.8m.  

For the Spinosaurus part...yeah, that's wrong. 

I still Sue is the largest. The method used to obtain the 8870 kg mass relied on femoral circumference, which isn't the most reliable volumetric mass estimate to use. It also had an inaccurate thirteen meter estimate, which is 0.9 meters longer than Scotty's actual length. The paper also had inaccurate estimates for other theropods, like ~1600 kg for the neotype specimen of Spinosaurus used in Ibrahim et al. (2014).

Wow, never thought a rex could get that big!

Here is the updated talent search information for "Jurassic World 3":

The Universal Pictures feature film sequel "Jurassic World 3" is now casting new lead and supporting roles, to star opposite two-time Teen Choice Awards winner Chris Pratt and Golden Globe Award nominee Bryce Dallas Howard. Talent located in any area can now register to participate in online open video auditions. There are roles available for both adult males and females, and also a number of roles for teens and children both male and female. "Jurassic World 3" will feature a storyline that ties the history of the "Jurassic Park" and "Jurassic World" trilogies together. Details posted at the following - https://laactingauditionsexaminer.blogspot.com/2019/03/new-talent-search-registrations.html