Comments (Page 338)
Latest comments by Jurassic World fans on news, forum discussions and images!
i know, but some poeple say its a synonim for eaither camarasaurus or apotosaurus
@Indiana, Brontosaurus is no longer a valid genus. They put the skull of a Camarasaur on the head of an Apatosaur. So your favorite would probably be one of those two. Mine is probably Shunosaurus lii.
speeking of sauropods, do you folks consider brontosaurus to be camarasaurus, or apatosaurus?
carnotaurus- i was almost going to use memencchieussussosaurus for a creative writing thing, but i changed it to camarasaurus at the last second
Argentinosaurus or Brachiosaurus.
Mine is amphiceolias.
shunosaurus is a close second.
Cool topic! Id have to say my favorite sauropod is either Brachiosaurus or mamenchiosaurus.
awesome work as usual :D
That's what some people were suggesting as they apperently worked on the movie. And, I think, in the trailer, you're just seeing the outside of the hand. And, we also can't forget that I-rex has cuttlefish DNA in him which would allow him to change color.
I don't think it's the I. rex (Still prefer D. rex).

The hand appears to only have two fingers (there could be a third, but I don't think so). Also, the body seems to have teal and while colors on it, not the tan we see in this image-

^Maybe this is an early concept?
Well, for the tooth in the trailer, I think that was a T-rex, not the I-rex. I saw leaked footage where the T-rex attacked the Gyrosphere.
Then again, to be fair, he did say he worked on JW which could mean anything. And, whith more than one person saying this, it makes it more credible to me.
Do keep in mind... Twitter is the same place where the Cancellation Rumor of the movie came from. (It's a long story that happened some time during Early Developement )
The fact that the user had to mention "Reliable source" And that it doesn't quite look like the one in the trailer also bothers me.
I've been hearing a lot of "Extras" Mention bits here and there about the film. At this point, There's so many fakes to so few real ones, I just take all of these "Extras" Information, As B.S.
Theres a fair chance that these are all accurate sources and that this is real proof.
But there's a lot of evidence aiding to it being invalid information.
I believe it was Verified that the Picture of the D-rex (The lovely Super Pixelated .JPEG) Is indeed the D-Rex.
The reasons for feathers being most likely a Digital Addition.
Another question I have, Is why are the extras told the storyboard? I know Colin wanted to avoid as many spoilers and such as possible, But that would kinda defeat the purpose, Would it not?
mm, both sound pretty good
Cool! Thanks for sharing this! :)
I didn't really have an age set out for the Rex. :) Thanks guys!
pretty good, one wlarus vs 9, walrus dont stand a chance i would say it could maybe hold its ground against 3-5 btw HOW DO U CHANGE YOUR PROFILE PICTURE
lol just read this on fox news
Hello again!
Thank you for the warm welcome and it's great to see people being enjoy Jurassic Park dioramas. Here is the next diorama I'd like to share...The T-rex Breakout!
Cheers,
Peter Hui







Of course T.rex won. Quetzalcoatlus didnt really stand any chance.
B-rex is 10 m long and it's an adult. But yes, 10 m is quite low, most of the fully grown specimens are in te 11-12 m range.
1 t sounds quite high for Quetzalcoatlus. Something like 200-250 kg is more likely.
I...FREAKING...LOVE PARASAUROLOPHUS
I'm pretty sure too. It would be too one-sided if it were an adult.
Nice fight. Was rooting for and expecting Rex to win.
Pretty sure it's a sub-adult.
Nice battle! As I expected, T-Rex, and yeah was he a sub-adult?
Nice, especially since I am a Lego fan and collect it, well sometimes, this makes me want the JW Lego! Now! Not later!
Just as I predicted...once a pterosaur gets on the ground, especially a large one, it will lose its life in a fight to the death.
Did you envision your T.rex as a sub-adult? 35 feet seems really short for a fully grown individual, it's only 10.6 metres, and all the adults are at least 11.5 m/37 feet.
Yo can u send me the trailer! Please! Thanks!
Ajacosta96@yahoo.com
Nice video and could you make the backround music less louder?
ahhhhh this brings me back
Whoa....I got 7 guys!
Guess I know more than I thought I did! XD
Fantastic work!!!
Looking forward to seeing more...and Welcome aboard! :)
This is pretty good! Thanks for sharing! :)
Hahaha....very cool!
Thanks for sharing! :D
I still don't like the idea of the Scientists deliberately creating such a deliberately violent creature. Would have been better to have been an accident, something which perhaps hatched as a suposed Rex and grow's into something else. Looking forward to seeing it though, whatever it's called.
Of course we'll never really know until we get actual visual evidence but here are a few things to consider. First off, velociraptors are confirmed to be in the film yet they are not in the brochure. They are however in the interactive console picture like the Spino and Dilophosaurus. Secondly, I think there may be some significance to the image that Trevorrow tweeted a while back. I think that that image of the east dock sign from Jurassic Park serves as a clue that Dilophosaurus will be in Jurassic World
PLINDER - Welcome to SCIFIED! The concept you have presented is quite neat and extremely interesting! Thank you so very much for taking the time to create and share this with us! :)



















