Jurassic World Movie News

Argentinosaurus or Puertasaurus?

Puertasaurus

MemberCompsognathusJune 08, 20153265 Views2 Replies

Why did they not take the opportunity to have some of the real giants in the movie? The Argentinosaurs or Puertasaurs would be visually impressive. Do you think they are saving the for sequels?  The IMAX doccumenteray Giants of Pategonia with a much lower budget and CGI effects provided some stunning sequences with the Argentinosaurus. It really is staggering that something that larged roamed around on land. Puertasaurus is even heavier.

User Avatar
Primal King
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I think they used Apatosaurus because it's a graceful, yet still large sauropod. As cool as Argentinosaurus and Puertasaurus are, they don't have the majesty or grace that Apatosaurus has. It's too bulky.

"If you can't see it... It's already too late."

-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)

User Avatar
NateZilla10000
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

If done correctly, Argentinosaurus would be a spectacle because of sheer size. Imagine the Brachiosaurus scene in the first movie but using an animal that's even BIGGER. That would be something to see.

 

I do hope they expand their horizons in future films with actual dinosaur species instead of genetic hybrids (like, cross-species wise). It's more fun to see animals in the JP franchise; leave the monsters to the monster movies.

Join the discussion!



Latest Media
Join the discussion!
Please sign in to access your profile features!
(Signing in also removes ads!)



Forgot Password?
Scified Website LogoYour sci-fi community, old-school & modern
Hosted Fansites
AlienFansite
GodzillaFansite
PredatorFansite
Main Menu
Community
Sci-Fi Movies
Help & Info
+

Sign In to contribute!