Yangchuanosaurus vs tarbosaurus

Tyrant king

MemberCompsognathusMay 08, 20151906 Views4 Replies

taebosaurus.

length: 32 feet long

weight: 4 tons.

height: 14 feet tall.

weapons: powerful bone crushing bite.

Disasvantages: slower, less agile, weaker arms.

advantages: probably bulkier, stronger bite?

yangchuanosaurus.

length: 33 feet long

Weight: 4 tons.

height: 14 feet.

weapons: bite, claws, hatchet bite.

disadvantages: not as bulky, weaker bite?

i say this is a 50/50 fight but I'm leaning towards yang just slightly.

Other discussions started by Tyrant king

Lord Vader
Group: Member
Rank: Tyrannosaurus Rex
View Profile

May 09, 2015

50/50 though I am leaning a tad in Tabo's favour.

Sure, it wasn't as agile, but it was close to Yang in that sense. Tarbo's bite wasn't bone crushing to the degree of T-Rex's, but it was powerful. Tarbo's bite was a combination of bone crushing and cutting.

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

May 09, 2015

It was mostly for crushing rathe then cutting. Yang had FAR superior dentition then tarbo for cutting and tearing flesh.

Lord Vader
Group: Member
Rank: Tyrannosaurus Rex
View Profile

May 09, 2015

I am aware of tha. It wasn't cutting to the degree Yang has, but it's not quite to bone crusher of T-Rex. It's more like 70/30 (70 being crusher and 30 being cutter). It's not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but it isn't the dullest either.

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

May 10, 2015

Nice break down.