Spinosaurus in Jurassic world

I really hope it won't be in JW, but if it is probably a paddock.

Title Suggested Reposted Topic, But since you're somewhat new, We'll let that one slide.

As the JurassicWorld.Com site already suggests, Aswell as the trailer, There's little to no chance of their being a Spino Physically in JW. 

The map also Shows no Paddock or Kingdoms for it, As it would need quite a large area. Plus, It's much more Lethal then the Raptors in the event of Lockdown or Power Failure. As all files from Ingen were handed over during the Purchasing of Ingen by Masrani; All of the Files on Spinosaurus would've been aquired, Including the Reason why they believed it too Dangerous or too early in development to be held in a park setting.

Aswell, 

The Paddock picture you've provided, Is actually a Confirmed D-rex Paddock from back in June (Date might be off, But it was mid to Early summer) As pictures provided from the Interior Match up with shots from the film. 

So far, The only Evidence of Spino Even being in Ingens Species list (2.0) Is the Multiple Education pictures, And the skeleton.

However, If spino ever did make an Appearance, It would require a signifigant amount of Territory, Such as, a Kingdom. A paddock would be much too small for it. Granted, If it was a small spino, It's got a fair chance in the paddock. 

thanks for breaking it down x_paden_x

No need for language D-RexManiacFan3354. Please don't use it in the future.

sorry

@D-rex

You're point being?

Age doesn't really matter, I answered you're question did I not? If you're offended, SO be it, Take it up with me in PM, But don't call me a "Dick". We can discuss and reach a conclusion in a Timely and fair matter. 

The chances of Spino being in JW are slim.

Also, On scified people will have Conflicting Views. Everyone is entitled to an Opinion. 

You think that Spino Might be JW, I think it might not, These are your, and mine Opionions, I simply challanged yours, Not tarnished. 

Be considerate when Responding with things, And if you would like to carry this On, I am wiling to PM Back and forth to get this sorted out. 

-Paden

yo im sorry

Apology Accepted. 

thanks man

We only have the species list and a skeleton confirming Spinosaurus, so it'll probably be in the park.

@Sci-Fi King

Why would they not have it on the Speicies list, I mean, Such a great Creature would obviously be a Head liner?

Also, Where in the Species list do you see Spino?

X_Paden_X, Brachiosaurus was confirmed in the leaked footage and thats not on the Species list.

D-REXMANIACFAN3354 - I'm of the opinion that it the Spinosaurus is indeed portrayed in the film, it will have a heavily reinforced viewing area with just enough space for him/her to be comfortabl. No need to give that big bloke enough room to charge! ;)

@LoS.

Apotasaurus, Actually.

I thought it was Brachi. Too, Those would've been a Hell of a lot more majestic but, Oh well.

X_paden_X- I think you should look again, I'm 100% sure it's a brachiosaurus, just take another look :) 

The species list in brochure?This species list is far from complete

The pic tell's why.

Also,if the leaked clips are right.it's 100% sure that Brachiosaurus will be in JW.

X_paden_X that is Brachiosaurus in the leaked footage, not Apatosaurus. Look at this:

http://coed.com/2014/11/24/jurassic-world-trailer-leaked-video/#!gallery-796196-796216-4

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20141128030715/jurassicpark/images/7/74/Apatosaurus.png

1. First of all Brachiosaurus holds its neck up like any typical Brachiosaur and some Titanosauriforms like Sauroposeidon. No Diplodocid had its neck pointing up like Brachiosaurus. The so called "Apatosaurus" holds its neck up.

2. May I also note that the front legs of Brachiosaurus are longer than the back legs, which also create an arched back, exactly like the so called "Apatosaurus" in the picture.

3. The so called "Apatosaurus" has a short tail compared to Diplodocid Dinosaurs, Diplodocid Dinosaurs had a tail that made up almost half its body length, they may have even used them as a weapon against predators like Allosaurus

4. The so called "Apatosaurus" is orange like the Brachiosaurus in the original Jurassic Park, the other Apatosaurus is sort of blueish-greyish.

This clearly points to that being Brachiosaurus, not Apatosaurus. Which confirms that there will be Dinosaurs in the park that aren't on the species list if the raptors weren't enough (and I understand that visitors may not be able to see the raptors).

@x_paden_x,

Spino is to the right, near the Mosasaurus and Suchomimus.

Again. I'm going off the list on the JW.Com Site. As far as we know, This is the bible of the dinosaurs in the park. Aswell... The site (Jurassicworld.com) Even mentions that it is seen BESIDE the Gyrosphere.

Check it out first.

As for the Spino, It's not on the park list. 

Not to mention, It's probably too dangerous to keep in such a park setting. Thus why they opted out for other reletives of Spino.

I do Acknowledge the fact that you've provided a Picture that has "Spinosaurus" on it. 

However. 

It's more so an Educational tool, Rather then an Actual Park guide. Most of the Info on it, Is most likely from Ingens Prior Records and Expeditions to Site B. 

Just because it's there, Doesn't nessicerely mean it's going to be in the park/film.

Going to back Paden up here, the spino rammed through a reinforced fence with realtive ease, so unless its confinement is made up of purely wooden doors, this animal could easily break out and kill many, many people. The spino is not a park-appropriate animal, and I'd like to think Masrani inc. is smart enough to realise this.