Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusSep-27-2014 1:45 PMI've done one of these in the past, but it's time for a revision regarding new material that has come to light recently
So, without further adue, let us begin..
10. Torvosaurus Gurneyi
The newest species of megalosaur to date, Torvosaurus Gurneyi is indeed a monster. Though not the twelve meter, 6-7 ton animal it was thought to be based on a 160 cm maxilla, T. gurneyi is still an immense animal. Tipping the scales at 3.5 tons at average and a staggering 5 tons as a maximum, Torvosaurus has earned its place on this list
9. Allosaurus Amplexus
A giant species of Allosaur that was discovered in the 90's, this animal is commonly known as "Epanterias" amplexus. Most paleontologists consider this a nomen dubium, as it appears to just be a rather large species of Allosaurus. Just how big? well, scaling off of "Big Al"(Allosaurus Fragilis) yields ~14meters, 7 tons. But, this figure is a bit baseless and a more safe size estimation should be based off of the DINO allosaurids.. The only size figures given (apparently Stovall´s estimates) published anywhere are found below:
lenght of 42ft (=12.80m), 6.25 tons(6.25 tonnes), height of 16ft (=4.88m in kangaroo pose) a gape of 4ft (1.22m) six inch (=15.2cm) teeth and eleven inch (27.8cm) foreclaws. By comparison Allosaurus was stated to reach only up to 29ft; 2 tons in weight
8. Acrocanthosaurus Atokensis
Slightly smaller then its later gigantic relatives, Acrocanthosaurus is still not an animal you'd want to meet in a dark alley. The largest individual, affectionately known as "fran" was an 11 meter, 6.65 ton beast. Slightly smaller individuals have been unearthed, though they are known fromless complete remains. Estimates for these two range from 10.5-11 meters TBL; 4-6 tons
7. Therizinosaurus Cheloniformis
The only plant eating theropod on this list, Therizinosaurus is a massive animal. Quite capable of self defense as well, sporting claws that could measure as much as 6 ft. It's appearance is quite bizarre- almost a potbellied, sluggish creature in overall stature. Perhaps this is due to its immense weight; T. cheoniformis tipped the scales at ~5.5 - 6 tons in TBW. Being so large almost certainly kept it safe from most predators - though the claws surely helped.
6. Tyrannotitan Chubutensis
Is it really a suprise most of this list comprises of Carcharodontosaurs? They were massive creatures, and Tyrannotitan was no exception. In Giganotosauridae - the subfamily that includes Giganotosaurus and MApusaurus; two other large bodied Theropods, Tyrannotitan is estimated to measure 12.5-13 meters in length, and, basing off of close relatives, would weigh in the ball park of 5-7 tons.
5. Carcharodontosaurus Saharicus
Ol' Carcharodontosaurus has been kicked around quite a bit on this list. Old estimates have stated it to be anywhere from 6-20 tons in weight, and well they were right-but in a way they probably didn't expect. Carcharodontosaurus appears to be overall more slender then previously thought, and a good deal longer. An overall TBL of 45-48 feet in length, but a meager 5-7 tons in weight have brought this Carcharodontosaur down slightly on this list, but still up there pretty high.
4. Edmarka Rex
The second megalosaur to enter the Fray, Bakker et al. was impressed with the size of Edmarka, noting that it "would rival T. rex in total length," and viewing this approximate size as "a natural ceiling for dinosaurian meat-eaters." Megalosaurs are very heavily built creatures. one "rivaling Tyrannosaurus in length' would be a very sizeable creature.Scaling up a 9 meter T. Tanneri to ~12 meters yields roughly 6.67 tons in weight - on par with the average Tyrannosaurus individual. It is distinguishable from T. Tanneri from several skeletal differences.
3. Giganotosaurus Carolinii
Giganotosaurus has always been in the top five largest predatory dinosaurs. It too has been kicked around though, and recent studies conducted in this decade have shown us something staggering. The holotype, once hailed as a 13 meter animal, has been shrunk down to 12.4 meters in length - a "Sue" sized animal. The second individua, based on scant skull remains, was said to be ~10% larger then the holotype. That would put it at 13.2 meters in length, with a proposed body weight of 7.5-8 tons. It's no wonder Giganotosaurus is still onc of the largest predators to ever walk our earth.
2. Tyrannosaurus Rex
One of the first large bodied predatory dinosaurs ever discovered, Tyrannosaurus has lways been heralded as the largest to ever walk our earth. However, several discovereies in the last twenty years have shown us something rather different. Have no fear- as you can see T. rex is still high up on this list. The largest individual to date, "Celeste" measured an impressive 13 meters in length, and weighed in at 8.5-9.5 tons in weight."Sue" once regarded the largest, measures 12.2 meters in length and weighs in at 7.4- 8 tons.
1. Spinosaurus Aegyptiacus
WHAT?!!you may be asking yourselves, and as i'm suspecting, i'm gonna have to support the hell out of this one to assure you Spinosaurus is still the largest predatory dinosaur to date. The new reconstruction courtesy of PAul Sereno's new finds suggests a semi quadrupedal gait. So, before i start in let me tell you that this new posture gives more surface area for weight to be distributed on S. Aegyptiacus' body. As for 3 ton estimates thrown around on this site because of the new finds, i submit to you ;BS. That's the weight that Sereno et. al gave for Suchomimus Tenerensis - an 11 meter spinosaur. Simple scaling yields ~ 12 tons for S. Aegyptiacus. A semi quadrupedal stance offers the possibility that Spino could weigh substantially more - not less. in fact, It would weigh 50- 75% more then "Sue". That would yield ~ 10-12 tons, sound familiar? So it is this new reconstruction that cements Spinosaurus as the largest terrestrial predator we have found to date.
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexSep-27-2014 1:48 PMWell, I was a tad surprised that Spino made number 1 after the new finds, but, you have brought up some valid points. Interesting as with everything else you post Carno.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusSep-27-2014 1:51 PMBelieve it or not, that suprised me a quite a bit too. I guess the semi quadrupedal/ semi aquatic lifestyle this thing lived offered it the grand oppurtunity to become more massive, as we all know water bound animals hae room to become a great deal heavier then their terrestrial counterparts - for example the whales. Even crocodile species for example; the more aquaticly bound species tend to be the more massive ones.
There's some new faces on that list, i'm quite pleased with how it turned out.
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusSep-27-2014 1:57 PMeh, That's not really my thing...
but, i've kicked around a few idea mainly;
Top 10 largest Ceratopsians
Top 10 largest Stegosaurs
Top 5 largest Dromaeosaurs..
...stuff like that
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Raptor-401
MemberAllosaurusSep-27-2014 2:10 PMVery cool list, I find it pretty easy to agree with. Looking forward to other future top 10s from you.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
Allotitan
MemberCompsognathusSep-27-2014 2:22 PMCool list Suprised at Spino, but the reasoning makes sense
When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Tell life I don't want you're damn lemons, and then squeeze them into life's eyes!
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusSep-27-2014 2:24 PMeh, i don't get why some thought because it was semi-quadrupedal meant it weighed significantly less, the papers and new reconstructions don't suggest that at all..
Glad you liked it :) it's good to be back
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Something Real
MemberTyrannosaurus RexSep-27-2014 3:54 PMCARNOSAUR - How very neat! I definately enjoyed the entires on your list. With regards to Spinosaurus, I must say that it's become one of my top favorite theropods ever since its revision. The semi-quadrupedal stance is, in my opinion, quite fascinating! The creature now strikes me as something of an ancient sea-serpent! Thank you ever so much for sharing this with us! :)
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusSep-27-2014 3:55 PMAwsome list, didnt expect the spino at first with all the people claiming it at 4 tons or less :p But does this weight mean the spino is really sluggish on land, I really cant imagine the new spino running! :3
Alphadino65
MemberTriceratopsSep-27-2014 7:59 PMLoving this list, especially with Spinosaurus on top. Before it's revision I guestimated it to weigh between 7-8 tons, but with the new information, the increased weight range makes sense. (Semi) aquatic creatures do weigh more, and the water works as a great support of its mass.
Sci-Fi King25
MemberAllosaurusSep-28-2014 6:23 AMNice list! Im happy Spino is still the largest. :)
“Banana oil.”- George Takei, Gigantis: The Fire Monster
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusSep-28-2014 7:47 AMNature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusSep-28-2014 8:54 AMIKR. It is semi aquatic wich means it would have extra support for his weight. 4 tons is utterly ridiculous for an animal of its size . Why do people even say that. It was a bout 9 to 11 tons on my books because the water could support the weight.
Primal King
MemberCompsognathusSep-28-2014 4:15 PMI would agree on everything on this list, however, there is one problem I have with it, and it belongs to #1, Spinosaurus. At the museum I've checked out exclusive pictures of the bones, and although it still belongs in at least the top 5, if not 3, it was not 12 tons in weight. Rather, 6-8.45 tons. The ribs and hips are the biggest tell-tale for this, the hips and legs (dense as they were) would take some serious, unrealistic musculature to hold up a body of that weight. Secondly, the ribs did not extend "outwards" which would show us a weight such as you have suggested. Instead they "curved" backwards, near barely distended, and more stream-lined. It was more built like modern gharials, who have surprisingly thin, shrunken skeletons. Not quite like a Nile Crocodile. I believe it should be tied with Tyrannosaurus for the #1 slot. Still a bump up in size, just not so greatly so.
"If you can't see it... It's already too late."
-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexSep-29-2014 4:01 AMInteresting PK.
Off topic, I can't help but snicker because prior to this new discovery about Spino, someone said Spino was the most land based Spinosaur of them all. Now, after this discovery, not so much.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Something Real
MemberTyrannosaurus RexSep-29-2014 7:55 AMPRIMAL KING - I happen to agree with your assessment. A dissertation forwarded by one nof National Geographic's foremost paleontological groups recently stated that Spinosaurus' wait was likely between seven and nine tons - which reflects the small size of its hind limbs and the lighter mass of its torso. Of course, this is pure speculation; that animal could have weighed upwards of 15 tons for all we know! However, it stands to reason that a weight of roughly 7.5 or so tons is most accurate. :)
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusSep-29-2014 8:56 AMNature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusSep-29-2014 12:58 PMThe reason a croc weighs more then a lion is because of sheer physical size.
Primal King
MemberCompsognathusSep-29-2014 7:24 PMYeah, Tyrant's right on this one. A lion isn't exactly 17 feet long, is it? And you should've scaled up a gharial, whose build is much more slender and Spino-like than a Nile or Saltwater crocs. That would lead to a 6.85 ton croc. So adding the extra weight Spino was packing, and that is an 8-9 ton animal.
If I had a mic, I'd drop it. *leaves room.
"If you can't see it... It's already too late."
-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusSep-30-2014 1:01 PMSo are you thinking they look like giant bipedal gahrials? Gahrials are very slender and have pencil thin jaws. spinosaurus did not have jaws THAT thin. I think it would have been bulky, not as bulky as say a croc but as bulky as a alligator.
Primal King
MemberCompsognathusSep-30-2014 3:16 PMI never said jaws, did I? I said build. As in the build was very thin overall. The jaw ends (maxilla and premaxilla) were actually similar to gharials, and I have seen spinosaur skull replicas where I work, so don't even try me there. However, the skull base was more caiman like. Definitely not Alligator like, who have stronger bites and are more robust than even Nile Crocodiles. So, the caiman doesn't have robust, heavily built jaws like Crocs or Alligators, but their jaws are more robust than gharials. But Spinosaurus definitely were not Nile crocodile robust.
"If you can't see it... It's already too late."
-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusOct-01-2014 12:13 PMwhen you say ends do you mean the tips. Cause I was talking about the whole jaws. They were not bulky like crocs or gators but hy hey were bulkier then gahrials.
Primal King
MemberCompsognathusOct-01-2014 7:52 PMThe actual snout. You have to admit there is a resemblance. The entire skull, no, but the snouts, yes.
"If you can't see it... It's already too late."
-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusOct-02-2014 5:28 AMYes, it does resemble a gahrial. But the body/skull doesn't.
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusOct-02-2014 5:16 PMSaltwater croc male average: 4.3 meters; 550 lbs
African Lion male Average: 1.86 meters; 386 lbs
Saltwater croc male maximum: 6.7 meters; 1.2 tons
African male lion maximum: 2.4 meters; 418 lbs
African lions are more robust at parity sizes, yet the Crocodile weighs more. and at maximum sizes, it completely blows the lion out of the water. And that's simply due in part to it's semiaquatic adaptations, such as the lacking of marrow cavities in the bones, Densely packed bones, etc.
Saltwater crocs are a good analogy for Spinosaurus because of jaw morphology and the "barrel chest" they're given with their recurved ribs. But i'll bite..
the average male gharial( false gharial as well) is ~2.8 meters in length, and has a weight of 1,100 lbs, which is large by crocodilian standards.
Your upscaling is a little bit off, not by much, but still there's a percentage of error there.
Scaling the 2.8 meter male False Gharial yields ~7.389 tons(7.4 rounding up) You appear to be underestimating the size of this gharial species. As for your caiman comparison..
Caiman species, despite common belief, can be quite large. Spectacled caiman average 2.5meters in length...and a maximum length for a big male would be 3.2 meters. The Black caiman, the largest species alive today, rivals the size of the Saltwater crocodile, with big adults easily surpassing 5 meters. So that croc upscaling i did up there ^ would be rather similar.
So, even with that small discrepancy, A spinosaurus of equal size would weigh in the ballpark of 9-11 tons.
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
kom
MemberCompsognathusNov-07-2014 11:14 AMCarnosaur,
You need to revise a bit your list. Maganuco has actually estimated the new, adult Spinosaurus at 6-7 tonnes. So Spinosaurus is no longer the very biggest but clearly still one of the biggest.
I dont think Celeste has been scientifically estimated in size.
Primal King
MemberCompsognathusNov-10-2014 3:42 PMMy point is they DID NOT have a barrel chest. That's what I'm saying. And I'm not saying to size off of caimans, I was telling him the the skull base is similar. As for the gharial reference, around the same size as I was going off of averages not maximums. I work at our state AZA approved zoo. (along with at the dinosaur museum here. Biggest dinosaur museum in North America.) However, it still is 7-8 tons, not 9-11. The only "heavy part of Spinosaurus was its very dense legs and hips, which (according to my calculations) contribute for about a fifth the total weight. Still not Tyrannosaur sized, I'm afraid.
If I had a mic, I'd drop it. Sorry for posting so late.
"If you can't see it... It's already too late."
-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)