Worst dinosaur documenteries

Hmm... How about Monsters resurrected: Spinosaurus?

Already the Rex and Spino have been introduced in this topic. Tread lightly ladies and gentlemen.

I am watching.

It alright.

I didn't even brign Rex up... You know what, I'll just edit my last post. That documentary was just bad, they just depcited Dinosaurs as full out violent creatures, just monsters.

Raptor,
I wasn't specifically targeting anyone, rather noting that most outbursts get started with those two dinosaurs. You mentioned one, the OP mentioned the other. Just be light on your toes.

I know and I try to be careful.

I will, but we're just talkign documentaries here.

What are your resonings for monsters reconstructed.

Because it was extremely scientifically inaccurate, not to mention it had a generally bad depiction of dinosaurs.

Did you notice the grass that was mowed?

I've only seen Monsters Ressurected: Spinosaurus, and the Spino was WAAAY to OP.

it was so stupid.

I've seen Monsters Resurrected: Spino, and I agree, it was OP as hell. Talk about life hacks there. 

Haha the scarcharadontosaurus was to skinny.

The Spino was too damn big. To deny that would be to deny that we live in planet Earth. That Spino was way too big, there's no way around. Carcharodontosaurus was every bit as big as Spino if you ask me, and Rugops was 30 feet long, more than half Spino's length (if you ask me). Nothing can pick up something more than half it's length and shake it around so easily. 

Ikr.

Monsters resurrected covered over dinosaurs as well, it portrayed Acrocanthosaurus alright, but megalania(giant prehistoric lizard) it showed as an oversized landshark, killing everything it came across. The spino episode wasn't too bad; with the exception of the Carcharodontosaurus section( it most likely didn't use the "slapping" offensive it was portrayed as posessing. A lot of inaccuracies regarding size as well. Rugops was more like 18 feet - thirty feet is assuming the holotype was a juvenile, which it probably wasn't. It's teeth were small, it's skull was horrifically weak when dealing with high pressues in the skull or lateral torsion, all which points to a scavenger; i wonder why Jack horner didn't take those points into consideration when thinking Tyrannosaurus was a scavenger?

With that said, Valley of the T. rex was hands down one of the most horrific attempts at a scientific outlook on Tyrannosaurus being a scavenger. For one, no terrestrial carnivore to ever exist on the fact of our little blue planet has scavenged 100% the entirety of its life. An animal designed for that would go extinct within a few generations. Secondly,. the tibula being longer then the fibula = slow runner hypothesis is bogus. Horses have this, and can reach speeds of 35 mph. Thirdly, an animal with an acute sense of smell doesn't mean its a scavenger. Smell is a vital part in hunting, but i guess he glazed over that.

He stated he wanted people to think differently, that the beloved Tyrannosaurus wasn't just a killing maching; and he's right. But, he went at it way to wrong. It's safe to say tyrannosaurus killed its prey, as we have evidence of prey animals escaping the attack(hadrosaur bones show signs of Tyrannosaur teeth, wounds evidently healed over) But, it most certainly wouldn't pass up a carcass when it saw it.

Going back to Monsters Resurrected, Spinosaurus in fact probably could pick up a rugops, but not shake it like it did. That was based on the assumption Spinosaurs killed like crocodiles, mainly because the skull is similar. Tests conducted on Spinosaurus' reconstructed skull show that it's skull would have multiple hairline fractures if it killed like it was portrayed to. 

i agree those were some pretty stupid documentaries

There is one documentary i absolutely dredded, but i cant remember the name for the life of me. 

Yeah, animal armageddon's rex is absolutely disgusting, but it's not nearly as bad as this one:

Ive never heard of Valley of the Trex or Dinosaur Armageddon, maybe i dont know them because obviously they are horrible!

I never saw Dinosaur Armageddon, but i'm watching it now, and i kid you not, the narrator said "thousands of millions of tons of rock and ice"....

@Carnosaur

*Reads your post

Me: wat?

there, haha i edited it....better?

When i saw the ice and rock part, i was like 
"no thank you" lol

@silver falcon what the heck is that from?

I don't even know. I don't think I want to know either, but apparently it is a T. rex.

that, my friends, is the product of a Tyrannosaurus and a Ceratosaurus...well..i'll let y'all but  2 and 2 together

is it bad that i like it? lol it looks like something out of fossil fighters or monster hunter

You haven't seen the end of the tail yet.

Although, it wouldn't be a bad monster in monster hunter... But the guy who made it says it's a rex, so... :I