Cretaceous Carnage #4

Well we do argue about Spino's diet about as much as Rex vs Spino, but that also.

@ spino rex, I get bored of them.

and if the size chart is accurate I don't see why rex would win with Ease. It is adaptted to taking armored prey. The worst that could happen to rex is a cracked shin.

That is true. I think we can all agree that, when fish were plentiful, it ate fish. Any other time, perhaps scavenging and hunting some Hadrosaurs. The young, old, weak and sick, like any predator would go for. 

Stop calling me S P guys just saucy raptor or rex or RR

WAIT! Cease this spino nonsense immediately. This is rex vs anky. Do you see a spino in there? NO. Now stop.

Well you already know my opinion on the deal, so ill just leve it at that.

Same here, sorry, it was an example. Sorry again, forget that happened. 

You are right SF, i wasnt the one to bring it up though, just pointing that out.

And Mr happy I have steppedon one and it hurt. But if you are wearing a Aho and are a large Pearson n and want not crush the Lego it will be crushed.

@Spino I understand that, just didn't want this topic to get closed. 

Anyway, as I said, my opinion on this is that it's like a coyote trying to get an armadillo. It might, but it's generally not worth the effort. So I say that neither wins. It is a draw.

SP, please, just please work on your spelling and grammer, it shouldnt take me 30 seconds to figure out one statement.

S-P wether you way 100 lbs,or 350 lbs your not gonna crush the lego... Also the reason people aren't calling you "raptorrex" is because that name is TAKEN.

By who?

You know who, you talked to them yesterday.

You commented on his freakin meme topic! facepalm* lift head* facepalm* facepalms turn to punches*

Wait,dynamosauruas imperious?

I will Change my name cause he had it first.

that got...random..

Well, this was a predator/ prey relationship. Anky got more defensively built as the years rolled by in the thousands/ millions, and rex developed bone crushing dentition. Though the prey of choice was probably hadrosaurs(Edmontosaurus regalis), Tyrannosaurus wouldn't pass one of these guys up because it has the weaponry to deal with it. But, do take into effect most land predators today have a ~30% of actually capturing and killing their prey, so this isn't going to be an easy meal in more then one way.

I'd have to say50/50 with the slight edge to the anky.

Well, i suppose if it could get ahold of its neck, it wouldnt have to worry about getting hit by its tail, which ultimately means the end for Anky due to having no protection under its neck, and the armor on top of its head and neck would amplify the damage under its neck.

In my 50/50 scenario, That's not even resulting in death(for the rex anyway) Most times, a Tyrannosaurus wouldn't be able to get at the underbelly of this thing, and there's no way i see it flipping the anky over. Anky's defenses were more deterents then ofenssive defense, it's tail is disproportionally short in retrospect to its body, and while i haven't read anything on the range of motion the ankylosaurus' tail had, i doubt it was very signifigant.

Actually thats the case with most animals that have those accesories, like the thorned lizard, which is simply most of the time more of a "do i look appetizing to you?" kind of thing.