Cretaceous Carnage #2

I'd, say Tyrannottian 65-35 as based on MY estimates it was larger, stronger and more powerfully bulit then Mapusaurus. 

Ok this is a hard one.

i don't know who has a better bite force so I can't judge on that. I honestly think that its A 50-50 chance. Tyrannotitan is more robust and might be the stronger one, but the Mapusaurus will have its useful arms which can do a lot of damage. Being these two are very, very similar, I'll stand 50-50

I'd say tyranotitan 60/40, because it seems more robust and stronger but who knows with so little fossils!

Both have a slicing dentition, so bite force persay wouldn't play much of a role in this one at all, if any

Mapusaurus, based on what i've found on it recently, exceeded the length of Giganotosaurus, but was surpassed by it in weight by 1/2 tons.

But saying it was the largest carcharodontosaur because of this would be like saying it was the largest theropod.

The 1.3m femur of Mapusaurus probably belonged to an 11.3-11.8 metre specimen, while the biggest one is probably 13.6m. The femur of the Giganotosaurus holotype is similarly long, albeit apparently more slender than that of Tyrannotitan (the latter factor not really relevant), but is not from the largest specimen.

I think the paratype of T. chubutensis was roughly comparable to the Giganotosaurus holotype, perhaps slightly larger (in 12.4-13m territory). Unless it was considerably more robust in built, its probably not quite as heavy as sue, albeit longer. We really don't that much on this thing though, so there's no way to really tell(other then the fact its femur is more robus then that of the holotype giga, which may be species variation)

Equally sized animals, in the same family, in the same place, seperated by a couple million years or so...this is a close one..i'll say 50/50 until i find  something that changes my mind

@HHP -  Tyrannotitan, mapusaurus, and giganotosaurus are all in the subfamily Giganotosaurini, a small group of fairly robust carcharodontosaurs that ontain the most advanced South American species, which they found to be more closely related to each other than to the African and European forms. Coria and Currie did not formally refer Tyrannotitan to this subfamily,  but when a more detailed description of that genus was initiated, they discovered that it is very likely a basal Giganotosaurine. 

Allosaurus

Neovenator

Eocarcharia

Concavenator

Acrocanthosaurus

Shaochilong

Carcharodontosaurus

Tyrannotitan

Mapusaurus

Giganotosaurus

I'd say Tryannotitan, 55-45.

I know carnosaur but, Tyrannotitian is still more robust and based off my estimates it is overal larger.

Oh yeah, the femur compared side to side with that of mapusaurus completely overshadows it in width. Other fossils from Tyrannotitan do this as well, but i'm not entirely sure this is a size characteristic or a species one..But overall, Tyrannotitan does appear to be more robustly built, while Mapusaurus is the pinnacle of evolution for the Carcharodontosaurs(at the moment any way)

I belive Tyrannotitan would win 60-40. Not too much of an expert on these dinosaurs, so I willl just estimate with dinosuars...

CArnosaur...

You ready for a long deabte!!!!???

breeng it yo!

we al now whos wrong ;)

that one party ;)

SORRRYYYYYY

haha very funny.