Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 4:09 PMi think that tey could because of their sheer numbers weapons and size.
JRR
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 5:55 PMSorry forgot to turn off the caps button
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 5:56 PMOne v one, a better opponent for Utahraptor would be Allosaurus Fragilis
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 5:56 PMCatzilla isn't on this tthread
and Utah wins this easily
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexAug-19-2014 5:57 PMWait, so Utah was closer to half a ton? Six Utah vs one Rex is a suicide mission for Utah. Sorry to say, but R.I.P. Utahraptor pack.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
FACT DUDE
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 5:57 PMIts just a differance of opinions here guys ;) And whoever brought Spino into this, dont bother thinking youll get an answer, that was a very stupid question to ask and can get you reported, you could have chose any other dinosaur to compare, but what you chose to compare was Spino.
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexAug-19-2014 5:59 PMNo. This was purely Rex, so no, no predators other than Rex and Utah.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexAug-19-2014 6:00 PMYou can think what you want, but don't tell me I'm wrong.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Raptor-401
MemberAllosaurusAug-19-2014 6:01 PMYeah, P-X it's quite childish to tell one other "party" that they're wrong and act smug about it.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexAug-19-2014 6:02 PMI know what you said, and the way you said implies that I'm wrong.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Raptor-401
MemberAllosaurusAug-19-2014 6:02 PMYou did a while ago.
"One party is wrong. ;)"
You typed that I believe.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:03 PMDon't now what you guys are talking about but I am sorry
JRR
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:03 PMWe are all wrong to an extent, we can't be sure abot something untill we seeit, maybe rex wahs bigger utahs smarter, the awnsere is that we don't know ho would win, we can only make assumptions and gueeses
Raptor-401
MemberAllosaurusAug-19-2014 6:04 PMYes, I forgot about that, we're basing this off educated assumptions, but in the end, they are just mere assumpstions.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:05 PMYes but 1500 pounds beating 8 tons not a fair fight
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:05 PMCatzilla - JRR i guess now: That's what we're debating right now. Hence, why we are actually..
Mr.Happy: perhaps not, six would be enough imo. Droms are smart, and they can use their numbers to flank the rex, or have some distract while others attack.
One v one, that would be a suicide mission
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Spinosaurus Rex
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:05 PMThat is quite the childish act to lie about what i just saw you post a few minutes ago PX, dont play that game, i dont like liers.
FACT DUDE
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:07 PMWell im just going to stick with my belief and you others can stick to yours, no questions asked.
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexAug-19-2014 6:08 PMPerhaps Carno. Just the same, Rex might be a bit much for them. If they're desperate, that's why they're attacking the Rex. If they're not desperate, they have no reason to attack.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Raptor-401
MemberAllosaurusAug-19-2014 6:08 PMYou know what, I agree with what fact Dude just said.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
JRR
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:09 PMquoting my sig. ''Everybodie has difrent opinions and you can't change that''
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:10 PMdrop it. No use in beating the dead horse.
The theropod database(quite reliable imo) had this to say on utahraptor:
Holotype- (CEU 184v.86) pedal ungual II
Paratypes- (BYU 9429) (3.89 m) mid caudal vertebrae (67 mm)
(BYU 9435) distal caudal vertebra
(BYU 9436) distal caudal vertebra
(BYU 9438) pedal ungual II
(BYU 13068) pedal ungual II
(CEU 184v.260) (5.03 m) tibia (503 mm)
(CEU 184v.294) pedal ungual II
(CEU 184v.400) premaxilla
Referred- (BYU 15465) (~5.9 m) femur (600 mm) (Erickson et al., 2009)
(BYU coll.) teeth (Kirkland et al., 2005)
(BYU and CEU coll.) (at least nine individuals; juvenile to adult; ~3-5.6 m, some ~11 m?) 190 elements including premaxillae, nasal, quadratojugal, cervical vertebrae, dorsal vertebrae, sacral vertebrae, proximal caudal vertebrae, coracoid, partial ilium, incomplete ischium, femora (310-565 mm), astragalus, metatarsal II, phalanx II-1, metatarsal III, metatarsal IV (Britt et al., 2001)
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Spinosaurus Rex
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:11 PMPX, you also said you have no idea what im talikng about, so man up and say you did what you clearly did and THEN say sorry, because your appology means nothing right now if you cant clarify what you said.
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:18 PMleave me alone I said SORRY I really must have pissed you off
Spinosaurus Rex
MemberCompsognathusAug-19-2014 6:20 PMApparently you didnt read my whole comment or you purely just dont understand.