lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-08-2014 8:06 PMHey there, i was wondering about how effective were spino's arms in a head to head combat? If we look at this pic, which is pretty reasonable, I dont see how its arms could slash out at a preadtor of equal size, unless they started huging!
Because I thought that most preadtors arms couldnt sviel that far up or something like that! What are your thoughts, I think im complety wrong though!
x_paden_x
MemberCompsognathusAug-08-2014 8:11 PMI'd imagine, Just like a humans arm, They'd be able to manuver them into multiple positions, As to swat at flies, Or deliver killed fish or such to their mouth.
They'd use them like human arms.
They'd also use them in Combat, As, an arm like that could slice open A dinosaurs belly.
Life cannot be contained, it breaks walls, crashes through barriers sometimes painfully, but uh... Life uh, finds a way
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-08-2014 8:17 PMOkay! Thanks, I just heard somewhere that their arms couldnt be put more than 45 degrees above their usual position.
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-08-2014 9:41 PMThe arms of Acrocanthosaurus had a poor range of motion, and i recently read the arms of the therizinosaurs had the same problem. Not entirely sure, as we haven't found the arms of Spinosaurus yet...But since we're already in this hypothetical mindset, why not. The new spino reconstruction had suprisingly short arms and legs.
I wouldn't say they really had a large range of motion. Acro had a whole whopping 45 degrees in every direction, my best guess is it wouldn't be a whole lot more then this
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 4:52 AMIt probably used it to fight other Dinos and to hook into fish
Sci-Fi King25
MemberAllosaurusAug-09-2014 7:22 AMI'd say it had a pretty big range of motion, as it could use them to attack, swat away insects, and help it eat.
“Banana oil.”- George Takei, Gigantis: The Fire Monster
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 8:18 AMOk I thanks guys, and carnosaur what is that reconstroction? Is it the nat geo one? And if that right, that spino is really short!
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 9:22 AMYeah, the nat geo reconstruction. It suprised the hell out of everybody i think, it pretty much confirms Spino wasn't the biggest theropod now. Still in the top 5 though, 6 tons isn't any thing to laugh at
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Hiphopananomus
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 9:29 AMYeah It would probably be considered 4th heaviest
the order being...
1. Rex
2. Giga
3. Carchar
4. Spino
that's just my opnion though.
"Somewhere on this island is the greatest predator that ever lived. Second greatest predator must take him down."Roland Tembo"
"Jurassic park: The Lost World"
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 9:56 AMthats strange cause i remember seeing it at 11 to 14 tons
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:04 AMI think that was from planet dinosaur. AND WHHHHAT! 6 tons and that short, I think It might be outclasses by the other big three! My god, can't wait until someone brings this up on carnivoria!
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:08 AMI haven't tried, they seem quite bais towards animals and Dino's.
Hiphopananomus
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:11 AMIf it was 6 tons the other big three would have it outclassed in weight for sure.
"Somewhere on this island is the greatest predator that ever lived. Second greatest predator must take him down."Roland Tembo"
"Jurassic park: The Lost World"
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:12 AMThey already did
that forum hasn't been very active lately though. I try to post a lot on there :D
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:17 AMThe consensus over there is they now believe spino wasn't as big as they previously thought...and i'm pretty sure theres a 'register' button up in the top right corner
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:17 AMSometimes they are, towards both dinos. They say stuff like OMG SPINO IS 20m LONG and 20tons, ONE SWIPE KILL DA TREX! and vise versa! But alot of people are actually very knowledge filled!
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:20 AMyep there are some rex haters, but spino haters too.
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:21 AMyes, but i think the ones with an unsavory biased against tyrannosaurs are no loner active there(banned or otherwise) neat little forum, really
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:24 AMYep it is huge, however is it active. It seems to be slowly lessing or something, I might be wrong though :)
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:31 AMit hasn't been too active lately, i posted about the new ornithiscian a couple days ago, usualy there's a lot of people with something to say but lately, not really
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 10:56 AMAfter 245 pages of the same arguments, it's about time ;)
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 11:34 AMLOL XD! It was never going anywhere, it started off good until the fan boys of both dinos came :(
Carnosaur
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 11:37 AMusually how that thing turns out
Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.
lxlplictz
MemberCompsognathusAug-09-2014 11:43 AMNow with this new revision of the spino, is it less powerfull? In terms of mussle and shoving power etc. ?