JURRASIC WORLD LEAKED GUIDE(MAYBE)

Interesting. Could be legit. 

I think it is legit because this site is also reporting it:

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=103551

It states that there are over one hundred prehistoric species on the Cretaceous cruise alone!

Oh sorry, I didn't read your post properly, I missed that you also got this from Comic Book Movie, probably because of how excited I am! I really think we could be looking at well in excess of one hundred species in this new park! 

Looks legit, wow over 100 species that's insane maybe we will all have our favourite dinosaurus in the movie at some point.

The leaflet also stated that the scientists in Jrassic Worlds creation lab are striving to re-create all the dinosaurs that have ever existed....

Wow! Nice find, seems legit...100 dinosaurs...excellent...Can't wait for the movie...get excited everyday!

Hmmm just noticed that there is a huge section of the island with out any attractions in it...wonder what's there...

It's probably just the large spaces required for the larger creatures or maybe eveb space for upcoming attractions!

Seems legit.

the empty spaces could also be also be remnants of the old park. then again one hundred species is quite alot so i guess they would need a lot of space

seems legit, i was rigth there is an underwater ovservatory for the mosasaur to cause havock

And what's better is that mosasaurus won't be the only aquatic beastie down there!

oh DinoSteve has posted the last picture and we allw ere wondering if the pic was legit or not.

JW Dinosaur List?

There are not necesarily over 100 species of dinosaurs in the park so far. On the cruise part, it only says "prehistoric creatures" not dinosaurs. Gorgonopsids anyone?

My hopes for this movie kep growig by every post like this. If this is truly legit which it appears to be then the movie is going to make my summer in 2015. This will be what saves the francize and inspire another generation to becme involved in paleontology.

Thank you!!, John Morrison! That is exactly what I think! I might just explode when this film hits theatres!

I'm excited because I knew this movie would be really cool 
but also kinda sad since there's no dilophosaurus in there

does any one notice the Ads, i think thats one more reason to tjink its legit

Atleast we know what the product placement is going to be?

Spinosaurus better be in this film! He's one of my favorite dinosaurs and he's bigger than T-rex! This guy eats fish and dinosaurs equally!

Let me just stop you right there. Spino was most likely longer than Tyrannosaurus. Spinosaurs were rather lightweight animals. They weren't pushovers, but they weren't extremely heavy. It is believed that Spino was mainly a fish eater, but not exclusively. Let's not turn this into a Rex vs Spino. 

T-rex had a big powerful jaw and ran fast and all, but its arms were too tiny compared to Spino's. Spinosaurus would have beaten down T-Rex with hisrazor sharp claws and powerful, corcodile-like mouth. He may spent most of the time eating fish, but he also ate other dinosaurs like Ouranosaurus during its time. And to anyone who thinks Spinosaurus should be phased out of Jurassic World and claim that T-rex is better than Spino, then here is my response.

spinos jaws couldn't have been power foul enoufgh to do that, they are to thin, if a rex and spino fougth in real life they would both die, spino could make many injurys to rex, then rex migth be able to brake spinos nek with his jaws, but some time affter he'd die of blood loss.

there every one happy, it would be a tie :I

We actually don't have any evidence that Spino's arms were massive. Remember, there are only around 15 bones to prove Spino even existed. We have no arms or legs. We can make a guess basing it off of other Spinosaurs, but we can't get an actual estimate until more fossils are discovered. Spino's jaws were more for gripping, not crushing. It would be a more even fight then what you give it credit for. Let's not discuss this any further, please.

Wasn't Spinosaurus related to Baryonyx and Suchomimus? Because I know for a fact that this is true and so Spinosaurus may would have had massive arms for fishing. Also, the gripping part is when it was fishing, because the fish it hunted down had rubber-like skin. When hunting Dinosaurs, spinosaurus would have crushed their downs easily. The fish can only be gripped by the Spino's jaws and to tear off the fish's flesh is with the claws that Spinosaurus had. Here is a video of what I mean when it comes with Spinos hunting fish.

How spinosaurus fished for prey

the diffrence between a Tyranosaurus and a spinosaurus is almost the same as a gharial(up) and a crocodille(center)

one is thiner and has eveolved so that his teath are able to grab fish, not crush bone like the other

I know it is. What I'm saying is we don't know just how big it's arms were. Spino most likely didn't have the bite force to crush bone. Spinosaurs in general weren't designed for hunting. They've got the perfect arsenal for fish and small dinosaurs, but nothing huge. 

Well, Spinosaurus teeth are strong and despite its snout-like jaws, it can crush its prey, unless if the prey turns out to be a fish like Onchopristis or a dinosaur with thicker skin. As seen in the JP3 movie, Spinosaurus could grip down on T-Rex's neck, if too thick to be crushed by Spino's teeth, and then used its arms to break the neck of its victim. Kinda makes me think of a Cretaceous wrestling champion with large claws, crocodile-like features, and a sexy sail on its back taking on a big mouth, tiny armed dino.

And let's not forget that its claws can deliver a killing blow to T-Rex. Spinosaurus was indeed a stronger dinosaur than T-Rex and was quite larger. Spino even had a thickr, deepr skull, but not broader compared to a gharial. Its neck worked like an ax much like Allosaurus and delivered a strong bite on land-based animals and used its teeth for gripping on the slippery skin of the fish it preyed upon. If Spinosaurus was facing an animal that had thicker skin (no like the ones seen in ankylosaurs), then the grip-on-neck and break-the-neck-with-strong-arms tactic should work.

Spinosaurus gripping on a fish:

Spinosaurus hunting a small dino:

Spinosaurus pwning a Pterosaur:

Spinosaurus's Neck-Breaker tactic:

Don't use JP3 for your arguement. It's about as accurate as Monsters Resurected. Both were total Bull. Dinosaurs in General did not have the wrist action needed to do such a thing. Much like the "T-Rex can only see movement" thing, it was purely theatrical BS made up for the purpose of the movie. Spino was longer and taller. That doesn't mean heavier. 

Maybe so, but I doubt T-rex was the better fighter than Spinosaurus. Truth is that we still have little information about how dinosaurs really lived millions of years ago. The T-rex vs Spinosaurus scene in JP3 was indeed made up, but perhaps how Spino dealt with rival predators may have been more violent. I was not suggesting that what Spino did in JP3 is accurate. I can assure you that in many dinosaur species, their lives remain a mystery to us all and they fascinate us. Spinosaurus is my favorite dinosaur and so is triceratops. Maybe if we had the DNA needed to clone back Spinosaurus and have it fight a T-rex, maybe something remarkable about Spino would happen unlike what we would expect it to be. 

http://listverse.com/2011/02/22/top-10-dinosaurs-that-arent-what-they-were/

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/community/forums/topic/26887

So please don't ruin my fascination with Spinosaurus. I love this dinosaur too much to give up. Back when in 2001, when I was just eight years old, I was amaized by the Spinosaurus JP3, even though the movie wasn't as accurate, but still I began to love Spinosaurus as much as Triceratops. That's why I want to see Spinosaurus and Triceratops in Jurassic World.

I think Silver_Falcon has a good point: The "over 100 species of prehistoric life" at the Cretaceous Cruise could encompass all sorts of organisms, from plants to insects, fishes, trutles, crocodiles and other water reptiles. Not necessarily all dinosaurs, but a more diverse prehistoric wildlife would IMHO be an even greater backdrop for the whole action!

Other than that, I did notice that the header above the creature list "Creatures of Jurassic", seems to be incomplete. Either it should be "Creatures of the Jurassic" and they just forgot the "the", though that would seem wrong with most of the species listed being from the Creataceous. Or it is "Creatures of Jurassic World" and a whole column of species on the right below the missing word "World" could also be missing. Does this make the brochure a fake, I don't know? I sincerely hope that there is a whole column of dinosaur species missing from the picture and that our faves like Velociraptor, Spinosaurus and Dilophosaurus will actually be in the Park, too.

There's to hope!

@the_captn well it is just a prop it doesnt really need to be complete and plus they might have anticipated a leak so they didnt put the whole list to avoid spoilers for everyone else