Disproving JP

x_paden_x
MemberCompsognathusMarch 24, 20141539 Views6 Replies'Ello Lads and lasses, How might your day be going? Good...?
I don't care.
I've decided to compile some things in JP that are really questionable, Working down from 3-1 (Less problems the lower I go)
JP 3: The Plane
Whoa... The spinos sail is introduced, and a plane crashes into it... Okay...
If I was just a civilian, and new nothing about planes... I would believe that it would crash.
Nope. A little history on why The plane wouldn't have crashed: When planes began using two engines and more, instead of one, Engineers began to make safety features to ensure that the plane could remain aloft if one, two, or three engines failed... An Avro lancaster (which weighs quite a lot more then the plane in the film) Has only four engines, it can fly on just one.
This plane has two engines, I believe that (Its a private plane) One engine should be enough to keep the plane up.
Also, Planes have had over 100 years to improve.
A way that the plane could've crashed, is if the spino, attacked the wing, or bumped it really hard, thus causing a barrel roll, or the plane to be caught in mid air. Stopping it, and killing most passengers.
JP3 has wayyyyyy to many things to disprove for this segment, so i'll just let that one slip.
JP TLW: "We need a bigger Boat
Life cannot be contained, it breaks walls, crashes through barriers sometimes painfully, but uh... Life uh, finds a way