Jurassic World Movie News

Dinosaur discussion

Carnosaur

MemberCompsognathusFebruary 23, 20142704 Views26 Replies

i opened this thread for one reason, and y'all know it. So, without further adue, let's get started.

Our first topic, The oh so controversial Spinosaurus.

Recent studies have signifigantly reduced its weight, from the estimated 20+ to around 7-9 tons. Spinosaurus size..

Now onto its diet, Fossilized barbs were found in the jaw, and once belonged to an Onchopristis, direct evidence of a  Predator/prey relationship. A recent study done in 2013 on the skull of Baryonyx revealed their jaw dynamics to be much like the indian Gharial. Gharials are mostly fish-eaters, but will take small deer if the oppurtunity presents itsself. Spinosaurs most likely ate the pterosaurs, or small hadrosaurs that coexisted with them. It's teeth were conical, good for gripping and puncturing, but not much else. A flailing animal would undoubtably break some teeth off. Spinosaurus probably stuck to the waters, only hunting land based prey when the dry season hit.

Now for the estimated total length. The first fossils unearthed by stromer in 1915 were enormous. Intial estimates placed it at 16-18 meters. However, given the harsh conditions it was unearthed in (the Sahara Desert) some believe it's just an abnormally large animal, as not much can survive th eroding forces of wind and sand.

Classification of poorly known theropods, and why it's difficult. Not that long ago, i did a Profile on Torvosaurus. In it, Saurophaganax and Epanterias were mentioned, alongside edmarka. It is believed that Saurophaganax and Epanterias are just large Allosaurus', while edmarka is just a large Torvosaurus. Fragments of the two allosaur-like beasts remarkably resemble those of Allosaurus, just larger. More remains wil need to be unearthed to be sure, now on to Edmarka. Robert Bakker distinguished the two from the  features of the jugal bone, which shows both primitive and derived features. Other fragmentary theropods are gigantic, but are, again, fragmentary. More would need to be unearthed to even distinguish them for known taxon.

And the largest theropod is..

Touchy topic. As we all know, largest refers to weight, not length. With new weight estimates for Tyrannosaurus and Spinosaurus, the largest may change. Contenders for largest theropods are mainly carcharodontosaurs, it's not difficult to see why. Giganotosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, Mapusaurus, and Acrocanthosaurus are all massive, Averaging at about 7-8 tons, with the exception of Acrocanthosaurus. I have yet to see a list made with carefully selected, scientifically based weight estimates. My personal opinion is Acro Rex got it mainly right in his post, but still, An official scientific one would be fantastic. This video provides a scientific outlook on the topic..Illiterate Scholar

Tyrannosaurus Rex: Hunter or Scavenger?

Now, this one comes down to just plain common sense. No Carnivore relies solely on scavenging. It just wouldn't survive. We all know jack horners theory, that it couldn't run fast enough to catch its prey. Ankylosaurs, Hadrosaurs, and Ceratopsians weren't particularly fast. Hadrosaurs reaching 15 miles an hour, Ceratopsians and Ankylosaurs reaching 10. Rex only needed to be as fast as its prey. Tyrannosaurus' bone crushing teeth helped get nutrients that no other carnivore in its region could, the bone marrow. Its teeth also allowed for it to eat most of a carcass. 

In 2008, tyrannosaur expert Thomas Holtz, Jr. did what Horner never did. Holtz stacked up Horner’s claims about the dinosaur’s anatomy and critically evaluated them. The notion that T. rex was best suited to be a scavenger crumbled. T. rex did not have unusually small eyes; biomechanical studies and limb proportions suggested that the carnivore was quick enough to catch fleeing prey; the dinosaur’s skull was reinforced to the point of being equally capable of subduing struggling prey and dismembering carcasses; and the oft-ridiculed arms of the carnivore would not have prohibited T. rex from employing the shattering power of its jaws.

Holtz’s argument went beyond the theoretical – damaged tail vertebrae on an Edmontosaurus skeleton gave away the depredations of another T. rexwho clumsily let their prey escape to live another day. 

Why it's dangerous to estimate Theropod BL from a skull

With so many large theropods known from bits and pieces, it's normal to want to estimate total length from the skkull, right? Well...it's just a bad idea. Some specimens might have an abnormally large head, or other factors that i can't come up with right now. Here's a study that explains it further.. My theropod is bigger then yours

Did dinosaurs change radically as they grew up?

Answer, probably not. Again going to jack horner, who seems to think there is one of every prey species in the late cretacious of North America. My main issue? Stygimoloch, DracoRex, and Pacheycephalosaurus have different bone arrangements on the skull. Bone doesn't shrink or morph with age. It's a physological impossibility. Torosaurus is found in spots Triceratops is not, and has two 'windows on its frill. There are even triceratops specimens larger then Torosaurus. Here's a video that explains it more..Torosaurus vs Triceratops.  Did dinosaurs have to grow quick in order to avoid being eaten? yes. Tyrannosaurus, for example, went through a drastic growth rate from the ages of 12-18.

Sauropods like argentinosaurus and Apatosaurus  also had to grow fast. Growing to  4 tons by the age of 3. This was mainly to avoid being eaten by the gigantic predators it lived beside. 

Well, there we are. My unbiased, scientifically backed opinion on various topics. 

 

 

 

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

User Avatar
Lord Vader
Group: Member
Rank: Tyrannosaurus Rex
View Profile

All good information and I agree with it all.

Jack of all trades. Master of none

User Avatar
Primal King
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Well, the thing is, My boss has worked personally with all the big names in paleontology. Jack Horner has put out theories to get funding, even though there is no evidence for the theories. Hunter vs Scavenger is one, and Triceratops vs Torosaurus is another. But good post, I agree with it all.

"If you can't see it... It's already too late."

-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

Very good information.

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
Dinosaur.Fanatic
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I mostly agree with the points you have made, Carnosaur. However, I do have one minor objection. I don't usually agree with Jack Horner's ideology, but his theory about change in dinosaurs was somewhat more sound than others. You noted that morphing and shrinking of bone is a physiological impossibility. It is actually a scientific fact that bone morphs and shrinks. It sound like you watched the documentary with Horner's theory, and you'll remember that he cited the Hornbill bird as proof of this drastic bone change. Or look at humans. The bones of our skull and jaws morph and change during adolescence, but shrink and change again in old age. Granted, Mr. Horner's comparisons were not the best (like you said about species being in different areas), but his comparison between the Pachy, Draco and Stygi as far as skull horn arrangements were not bad at all. Horner's partner even noted that the arrangement of horns was very much the same. This was my only objection. I found no problems with your comments on Spino, and I agree that Rex was NOT a scavenger.

"Either way, you probably won't get off this island alive."

--Alan Grant

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

I agree with the theory that said that Rex was a pack hunter. I am pretty sure every dinosaur fan knows about that theory.

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
Primal King
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Im with you Dino.Fan, and I believe Rex was a lone hunter, unless it had a family, in which for a short while, it would hunt in family groups.

"If you can't see it... It's already too late."

-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)

User Avatar
Acro Rex
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

What you said here actually makes alot of sense...good job..

"Our lives are in your hands and you have butterfingers?" - John Hammond
User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

Well it makes sense, last I heard T-Rex wouldn't have been able to run fast enough for prey that runs a lot. T-Rex ran like 15 mph. Pach hunting makes sense, di you watch the video where they found about 68 fossils right next to each other in the desert?

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
Carnosaur
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

@dino fan, yes, i forgot about that bird...i still see them as valid taxon though.

@raptor401, Tyrannosaurus fossils? or Tyrannosaur?

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

Tyrannosur fossils, came form a dinosaur very closely related to T-Rex

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
Carnosaur
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

oh yea, the albertosaurus bone bed...it's possible Tyrannosaurus lived in small groups, though it wouldn't really be needed

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

User Avatar
Primal King
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I still stick to lone hunter with family groups every once in a while. Albertosaurus, was much too lightweight to be able to take down certain prey alone.

"If you can't see it... It's already too late."

-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)

User Avatar
Acro Rex
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

thanks for the shout out btw!

"Our lives are in your hands and you have butterfingers?" - John Hammond
User Avatar
GODZILLA HIMSELF
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

awesome topic, those are actually some of the arguments i use every time i debate with people  about spinosaurus :)

as for the hunter vs scavenger thing, heres my opinion

the younger, lighter built rexes, would go after smaller and swifter prey. while the big adualt rexes, either bullied other animals/eachother and stole their kills and hunted the tougher animals, such as triceratops, on the side. simply put, i think T.Rex would have been an opportunnistic animal

king of the monsters

User Avatar
Rex Fan 684
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I think T-rex did hunt in family groups. Keep in mind that if one finds a skeleton alone, that does not mean it lived alone. All members of a pack do not have to die all at once and if one member dies, the rest of the group ain't gonna stick around until the day they all die as well. A "lone" T-rex might be unearthed, but he really was the alpha of a pack. He just died of old age and the others moved on. Simple as that.

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98
User Avatar
GODZILLA HIMSELF
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

wow, someone else has actually thought of that!!! ive always though of t rexes living kind of like lions, with younger individuals doing what the femal lion does today, and the big older ones, being the alpha and defender of the territory

king of the monsters

User Avatar
Rex Fan 684
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Also, a group of Daspletosaurus has been unearthed, showing more pack hunting among tyrannosaurs. Yutyrannus has also been found in a group.

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98
User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

Wll I think T-rexes are cooler as pack hunters.

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
Primal King
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I just think T. rex didn't need it all the time. Just my opinion. ;)

"If you can't see it... It's already too late."

-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

Well I think so. And you may already know, but they discovered that T-Rex was most likely a giant bird, like most dinosaurs, and lots of times birds travel together. So that suggest that T- rex would probably have lived in groups.

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

Join the discussion!



Latest Media
Join the discussion!
Please sign in to access your profile features!
(Signing in also removes ads!)



Forgot Password?
Scified Website LogoYour sci-fi community, old-school & modern
Hosted Fansites
AlienFansite
GodzillaFansite
PredatorFansite
Main Menu
Community
Sci-Fi Movies
Help & Info
+

Sign In to contribute!