Rex killer

I doubt its poisonous, but Nanotyrannus is a very possible killer if baby T. rex. Also, Mrhappy, I thought Nano-T had a bite of around 900 lbs.

Lets use the Kamodo and its saliva has a toxic in it to paralysis the animal it wounded now NanoTyrannus had that same toxic in its saliva this would help it in fighting the Tyrannosaurus rex it would slow it down but lethal on the first bite. Now the NanoTyrannus had more speed the Trex to get around it. But the down fall is to NanoTyrannus was the fact that it would mess with the juvenile rexs which led to its own death if it didt not leave the nesting site. Trex would had have the biggest advantage do to its size and strangth.

Buddy, no offence, but there's absolutely no evidence for NanoT having a toxic bite, or any Dinosaur being venomous. Nanotyrannus killing baby Tyrannosaurus? Yeah, sure, probably. It makes sense. However, the Jurassic Fight Club idea of Nanotyrannus homing in on Tyrannosaur nests to kill the infants? No, that'd be suicide, I doubt both parents would leave the infants alone & if the idea of Tyrannosaurs living in extended family groups is correct it's likely that atleast one adult or sub-adult would be around to look after the infants at all times. Nanotyrannus didn't have a toxic bite, and it wasn't a juvenile T.rex. Fossil record seems to show that it was pretty thin on the ground and probably, as a species, on it's last legs due to competition from other predators.

I know that but im basing it off of the fossil records in Cleveland I help the run xray on the bones on the dinosaur and im looking forward to dig up and finding new speices of dinosaurs and im only 17.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

I'd like to see some sources for the toxins in Nano.

Also, when Komodo dragons use their "poison", they only bite the animal once and then wait for it to die, which could take days. It would be near useless in an immediate fight.

Thank you thats what I've been trying to say.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

I was asking for sources on the Nanotyrannus poison. You said it had been discovered, but I've never heard of it.

Its saliva like trex its very infectious when it bites down on its pray

@DASPLETOSAURUS

I'm not sure you're understanding me: I'm asking for proof of the Nanotyrannus saliva. You're the first person to tell me this, so I would appreciate some sources.

Also, the T .rex saliva has already been disputed.

Look the NanoTyrannus is just a smaller Trex and it has the same saliva as Trex. That is what has been proven this smaller cousin of Tyrannosaurus Rex used this saliva just like Trex by infecting its pray or killing it ether way the animal is dead.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

No, it doesn't. You haven't given me any proof for the saliva on the Nano, and I already told you that poisonous saliva for Rex has already been disputed.

look i wanted to interduce Trex cousin NanoTyrannus and how they were different and alike but you think that the saliva in Trex mouth is diferent then NanoTyrannus well go study on the different types of Tyrannosauridae and then comment back.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

Have you read anything I've posted? I already told you, there is no evidence for poisonous saliva on T .rex, and there isn't any on Nanotyrannus either.

Also, let's test YOUR knowledge on tyrannosauroids, so answer these questions please:

1: Which is the oldest known tyrannosaurid?

2: Name 2 tyrannosaurids which are known to be feathered.

1. The Lythronax is the oldest do to the tyrannosaurid only appeared 70 million years ago, and the Lythronax evolved 10 million years earlier.

2. One is the Dilong Paradoxus and the other one is Yutyrannus

@DASPLETOSAURUS

Good, you know your tyrannosaurids.

However, I already told you, it has already been proven that T .rex did not have poisonous saliva. Not only that, but there is zero evidence for Nano having poisonous saliva.

Ok

Alrighty then, good debate.

@DASPLETOSAURUS

I understand your intentions, but most people who are into Dinosaurs know who Nanotyrannus is, so you don't really need to "introduce" it to us. Secondly, there is no evidence of toxic saliva in any Dinosaurs. Could a bite cause an infection? probably, yeah. But as has been stated, such an ability would be absolutely pointless in a fight, becase it would take days or even weeks for the prey to succumb to the infection. Komodo dragons & other monitor lizards are actually venomous, they have venom glands like their close relatives, the Snakes. So the septic bite is something of an un-intended side effect of tooth serrations and meat diet.