Jurassic World Movies

T-Rex/Spinosaurus comparison

Locked8428 Views132 Replies
Forum Topic

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexJun-20-2013 6:00 PM
I know lots of other discussion are just like this, but I am trying a different way of comparing them. Advantages: Rex- Huge bite force, binocular vision, sense of smell, intelligence Spino- Huge arms, huge claws, more intimidating (appearance) Disadvantages Rex- Tiny arms, slow, if it fell, it would likely die Spino- Weak jaws (by comparison), slow, likely death if it fell Uniqueness Rex- Oversize head, tiny arms Spino- sail, huge arms for large predator, swimming Known for Rex- King of the dinosaurs, one of the largest carnivores Spino- Beat Rex in JP3, sail, bigger than Rex How is this? Are my thoughts reasonable? Feel free to make any corrections, add something, and enjoy.

Jack of all trades. Master of none

132 Replies

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusJun-27-2013 2:58 PM
I think any carnivore that weighs over 8 tons would sustain injury if it fell no matter what. When you have that much weight falling, I don't care how big your arms are, it's gonna hurt.
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Spinosaurus Rex

MemberCompsognathusJun-27-2013 9:12 PM
im sure Spino probably walked a lot too, probably more than swimming

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexJun-27-2013 9:18 PM
That's true. Any dinosaur is going to walk a lot. T-Rex and other large predators would probably follow a herd of dinosaurs around and therefore walk more than Spino, which likely would have just stayed near the same lake or river until it needed to find a newer, better fishing ground. It would walk more to find carrion and hunting small dinosaurs (not saying it can't take a larger dinosaur).

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Dinosaur.Fanatic

MemberCompsognathusJun-28-2013 7:27 AM
I have a comment to sort of turn this discussion in a different direction, based on a sub-discussion from another thread: I've always had this theory that Spino was not truely that attuned for swimming as depicting in Jurassic Park III. I thought that that fight scene was more fictional than scientific. But if you look at the skeleton and build, the clawed limbs would not be built for paddling through deep water. There's also the formation of the limbs in which the legs are longer than the arms, making it difficult for swimming (except in very deep water) unless the back legs were sprawled out behind. Also, while Spino's eyesight was good, I can't imagine it being able to see well underwater. To imagine Spino gliding through the water hunting fish is to me like imagining an ostrich taking flight. I do think Spino would have hunted fish, but either standing in or beside the river, and at most wading into it, but not actually swimming underwater. (Keep in mind I'm on team Spino, not by any stretch trying to undermine my favorite dinosaur or anything). Thoughts?

"Either way, you probably won't get off this island alive."

--Alan Grant

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexJun-28-2013 9:41 AM
That is interesting. I think i mentioned something about it not swimming much on a different discussion.

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusJun-28-2013 2:46 PM
I agree. It could probably swim if it had to, but not on a daily basis. That sail could catch a breeze and blow it off course if it was above the water, then again, it could act like a sail on a sailboat, I don't know. There is one thing I would like to point out about Spinosaurs. It's not downgrading him or anything. It's the way it won the fight I JP3. Of course Spino could beat a Rex once and a while, especially a sub-adult like in JP3. However, the way he did it was all wrong. It should have used it's claws more. They had him grab the Rex by the back of the neck in it's jaws and hold it's shoulders and head with it's hands to keep it from getting away. That was one thing. Then, he used his hands to twist the Rex's neck which broke it. Based on my research, which I did a lot before I brought this point up, Spino did not have the wrist action required to do this motion. It's not a matter of it's jaw strenth, but how it's wrists and hands could move. I just thought that was interesting.
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Dinosaur.Fanatic

MemberCompsognathusJun-28-2013 3:15 PM
Spino had a pretty good grasp on Rex's neck, and he used his arms to his advantage, aiding his neck muscles in snapping Rex's neck.

"Either way, you probably won't get off this island alive."

--Alan Grant

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusJun-28-2013 3:24 PM
Yes, like I said, Spino did not have the wrist action needed to do that motion. I found it interesting that the Spino "magically" slipped free from the Tyrannosaurs' jaws. I think Spino should have used it's claws far more than anything else. The Rex should have used it jaws more than just head-butting the Spino.
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexJul-06-2013 10:02 PM
I found an image with a skull comparison. [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20101003190116/archosauria/images/e/e2/Skulls2.png[/img] Pretty sure the one on the left is Carchar.

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusJul-07-2013 2:45 PM
It is. It can also represent Giga in a way. All of them are huge. Spino and Carchar/Giga may have longer skulls than Rex, but Rex's is more powerful. It's like a bull-dog or Rottweiler compared to a husky or Labrador. Not as long, but stronger.
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Gigadino

MemberCompsognathusJul-24-2013 4:42 PM
I think this is a 50/50. Both were huge and dangerous predator.

PrehistoricTeen

MemberCompsognathusJul-27-2013 7:29 PM
Spinosaurus, unlike T-rex, would have hunted in the water because paleontologists believe it had pressure sensors at the tip of the snout like a crocodile, would that have made the T-rex stronger because it was more used to taking down bulkier prey and weren't T-rex's teeth sharper?

The forgotten king

MemberCompsognathusAug-16-2013 11:11 PM
This is a great comparison good job!!!!!im curious do you like spinosaurus?i like both Rex and Spinosaurus ,I like spinosaurus more cause it is so unique
welcome to the new age

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexAug-17-2013 9:22 AM
Yeah, I like both. I just like Rex a bit more. Spino is top 5 for me though.

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Mk211

MemberCompsognathusAug-24-2013 3:02 PM
The T. rex was a fighter and far stronger. I read this interesting article The Tyrannosaurus Rex’s Dangerous and Deadly Bite "The dinosaur had the strongest bite of any land animal – even harder than we previously thought" By Brian Switek

Tomcarterhestard

MemberCompsognathusSep-01-2013 10:51 PM
Haha...!..not the T-Rex,Spinosaurus was the smarter dinosaur...!..just go and check up on some facts...the -T-Rex's vision was based on movement,so if we didnt move,we can easily escape the Rex,but not the Spino...we cannot stay like that in front of a Spinosaurus..!..It'll swallow us in a glance..!..he'll know that we're living or non-living if we even didnt move..!..and because the Spino also caught fish,it should probably have a higher IQ...catching fish is not like catching prey on land,catching fish is a 100 times difficult,and while catching fish,spino hunted land-prey too...it means Spino was smarter....than a T-Rex for sure..

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexSep-03-2013 6:28 AM
Reading all three of your posts, I have a feeling that you don't really like Rex all that much. There is no proof that Rex couldn't see movement, and I remember hearing that it could see heat signatures (also unlikely). This may sound like a strange request, but could you please state that these are your OPINIONS. I have mine, and you have yours, and we prefer to have others say opinion, rather than, "This is what I think, so this is what it is." We have dealt with others that were worse than you (no offence guys, you're great now).

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusSep-03-2013 1:23 PM
Tomcarterhestard, 2 things 1. T-rex seeing only movement is complete bull. It could not survive like that. The thought that T-rex could not see in movement is something created by Jurassic Park, not a proven fact or even an accepted theory. Tyrannosaurus almost certainly had binocular vision with a good visual filed overlap. 2. As far as intelligence goes, T-rex belonged in the same group of dinosaurs, the coelurosaurs, as Velociraptor, Deinonychus, Troodon, and modern birds. It's simply common sense that T-rex would be very smart. Spinosaurus belonged to a much more ancient group. A more primitive group. While smart for a spinosaur, I seriously doubt it was smarter than a Tyrannosaurus, a member of the smartest dinosaur group. Thank You
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Godzillasaurus

MemberCompsognathusNov-28-2013 4:29 PM

Tyrannosaurus did not necessarily have an oversized skull, just a very heavily-built skull. Spinosaurus actually had the longer skull of the two, although it was much shallower and thinner dorsally. I am talking about when spinosaurus is larger than tyrannosaurus, of course, as skull lengths are determined by an animal's size and head-body proportions.

Deltadromeus

MemberCompsognathusNov-28-2013 5:09 PM

Godzillasaurus, T. rex did have one of the biggest haeads proportionately. Spino did have a longer skull, but Size doesn't determine the animal's skull length. Take Giganotosaurus. It probable had a head of 6 feet while 46 feet long, but Spinosaurus only had a head of 7 feet at 60 feet long. 1 foot difference head, 15 foot difference body. There isn't that big of a jump with T. rex. Its skull is about 5-6 feet long, at 42 feet. Only one foot difference with three feet difference.

Hi

Godzillasaurus

MemberCompsognathusNov-28-2013 6:12 PM

I wasn't talking about proportions; I was talking about an animal having a larger skull due to larger size. Giganotosaurus and carcharodontosaurus had paritcularly longer skulls proportionally than tyrannosaurus and spinosaurus, but that does not mean a bigger spinoaurid or tyrannosaurid will have a smaller skull. That is what I meant. Size does not determine proportions

Deltadromeus

MemberCompsognathusNov-28-2013 6:35 PM

Right, but you where sadeter body size deteremains skull length, and that's not exactly true either. Partially true, but not 100% spot on. 

Hi

Godzillasaurus

MemberCompsognathusNov-28-2013 7:26 PM

Proportions and size both determine skull length. Size as a whole does not do so, but that in conjunction with head-body proportions does. An example would be a similarly-sized carcharodontosaurus and tyrannosaurus; the allosaur would have a much larger skull.

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexNov-28-2013 7:54 PM

I'm with Delta on this one, and we all know each others opinions. I personally think that Spino maxed out at 60 feet, but averaged around 50 feet. I think Rex averaged 40 feet and maxed out at around 45 feet. Let's not get into overall size, we all have DIFFERENT opinions on this topic, and it was a bloody stalemate, which is why we decided to kill the topic.

 

So Rex vs Spino is dead, it's nice that you have your opinions, but let's not get into which is bigger, that's what pisses people off (not to mention getting the regulars to swarm the topic).

 

So please, no more Rex vs Spino. Sound good?

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexNov-29-2013 3:07 PM

Did what I say there just go in one side of your brain and out the other? Its literally the comment before yours. We all know this stuff, and we have all stated it at one point what we think would happen. The only Rex vs Spino discussions that were posted recently are by people who signed up recently, but as I've said countless times, Rex Vs Spino is dead, it's a stalemate between members, so we stopped.

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-29-2013 5:02 PM

MrHappy is right. And also, why are so many people coming back to these older posts?

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexNov-29-2013 6:30 PM

No idea. Probably because these are the first ones that appear.

 

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Rex Fan 684

MemberCompsognathusNov-29-2013 7:00 PM

Perhaps that's it.

"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98

Sci-Fi King25

MemberAllosaurusNov-29-2013 7:34 PM
I like this! I'm a Spino fan but I find this list very accurate.

“Banana oil.”- George Takei, Gigantis: The Fire Monster

Lord Vader

MemberTyrannosaurus RexNov-29-2013 9:36 PM

Thank you, for both agreeing with this list, and not stating any opinion on which would win.

 

Jack of all trades. Master of none

Add A Reply
Latest Images
Community Stats
This Jurassic World Movies community is part of the Scified network. Scified hosts a network of online fan-site communities containing 405,845 posts by 48,227 members (6 are online now). The Jurassic World: Rebirth Forum is the most recently active forum. The latest Forum topic added was: Jurassic World 4 hits theaters in 1 year! Are you excited?
VIPWhat are VIP?AdminModeratorSpecial TitleMember
Jurassic Park/World Jurassic Park Fandom
Latest Features
Jurassic World Movies Forums
Jurassic World: Rebirth
Jurassic World: Rebirth Discuss the new Jurassic World film by Gareth Edwards!
Dinosaurs
Dinosaurs Talk About Dinosaurs
Jurassic World Fan Artwork
Jurassic World Fan Artwork Share your Jurassic World fan art here
Jurassic World
Jurassic World Discuss Jurassic World Here
Jurassic Park
Jurassic Park Discuss Jurassic Park 1 - 3
Jurassic Park Games
Jurassic Park Games Talk About Jurassic Park Games
Jurassic World Merchandise
Jurassic World Merchandise Discuss Jurassic World merchandise here
Hot Forum Topics
New Forum Topics
Highest Forum Ranks Unlocked
Latest Jurassic Fandom Activity

JurassicWorld-Movies.com is a fan website dedicated to all things Jurassic Park and Jurassic World! This website was developed, created and is maintained by Jurassic Park fans and is not officially affiliated with Universal Pictures, Amblin Entertainment or any other respective owners of Jurassic World IP.

© 2024 Scified.com
Sign in
Use your Scified Account to sign in


Log in to view your personalized notifications across Scified!

Transport To Communities
Alien Hosted Community
Cloverfield Hosted Community
Godzilla Hosted Community
Jurassic World Hosted Community
Predator Hosted Community
Aliens vs. Predator Hosted Community
Latest Activity
Forums
Search Scified
Trending Articles
Blogs & Editorials
Featured Forum Discussions
Forums & Community
Sci-Fi Movies
Help & Info