Rex vs Spino

t-rex

t-rex

As some of you know I am on team Spino. It was a really difficult decision to make considering I LOVE t-rex and am amazed at the ferocity of t-rex in jurassic park. I agree that it is improbable that Rex would lose to Spino in a fight, because T-rex has the skull, weight, and speed of a killer, while spino mainly ate fish and is lighter and more delicate with that sail-fin. My favorite dinosaur is probably dilophosaurus.

T.Rex would win most of the time (it is possible for T.Rex to have a bad day e.g. JP3). I was actually kind of surprised reading Dinosaur.Fanatic's comment. I have never actually seen anyone who is team Spino, but still agrees T.Rex would win because most of the time, Spino fans are so heavily biased in Spino's favour, that it is comedy more then anything. I am on Team Rex, but I do like Spino. On other discussions on different sites, people said Spino's sail was an advantage, and others said that because Spino had long arms, it could rip T.Rex's head off before T.Rex got close enough (LOL). Anyway, I do wish that there where more Spino fans like Dinosaur.Fanatic, looking at this statistically, not just by which one they like better. T.Rex would likely win due to superior bite force, overall strength, and toughness.

I'm going to set this straight right now for anyone who thinks Spinosaurus would win. T-Rex would win, u can argue it all u want but here r reasons why. T-Rex does have a greater bite force. But that doesn't mean it wins automatically. Spinosaurus had longer arms than T-Rex but that doesn't mean anything. If u look at what the fought and ate during their time you will know the difference between them. T-Rex lived with Triceratops, Ankylosaurus, and Edmontosaurus. It was difficult for T-Rex to get a meal against tough prey. Triceratops 8 foot skull with 3 foot horns. Ankylosaurus was covered in armoured bone and had a deadly bone breaking club. T-Rex had challenges. Now Spino is larger no doubt , had longer arms with big hook like claws. Those were used for fish!! Its snout was long to catch fish! It ate fish! It had its nostrils up closer to its eyes so it could stick its mouth in the water and still breathe. They also killed some juvenile dinosaurs. But those r juvenile. Nothing like T-Rex. Spinosaurus would piss him self if he saw T-Rex coming at him.

Yeah, I think T-rex would win. Spinos sail would probably be a disadvantage. It would make him less agile and was full of blood vessels. It a rex bit it, it would be like a big blood filled cookie for him. Yum, haha. I even think that, while Spino was 6 feet longer and maybe taller, T-rex was much heavier, and therefore, bigger. Spino=4-6 tons, T-rex=7-9 tons or more. Just sayin

They weights were about the same actually, both around 7 tons give or take a ton. That Rex in JP3 was the smallest T-Rex of all the other movies and it was probably a young one too. That was a disadvantage for it.

All of the paleontological evidence points toward Tyrannosaurus taking the cake. He was a larger carnivore when it came to mass, he had to take prey that was not only well armored, but extremely deadly. Spinosaurus ate fish, the only real challenge I could see a Spinosaurus facing would be something like a Leoplurodon, maybe even Predator X. I'm also still quite skeptical on the size of Spinosaurus they've never uncovered a full skeleton, only some pieces. Those were destroyed in a museum in Europe during WWII. I just didn't appreciate the fact that they had a new dinosaur come in out of nowhere with no backstory and take down our tyrant lizard king. Either way, evidence points to Tyrannosaurus defeating Spinosaurus.

I agree. Spino ate fish, small dinosaurs, and carrion. T-rex ate ceratopcians, ankylosaurs, Alamosaurus, duck-bills, etc. Spinosaur was longer, but Rex was heavier and stronger. Spino did live w/ Charcarodontosaurus and the giant croc Sarcosuchus, but would likely back down if he came across one. Tyrannosaurus was also more advanced. More intelligent. He was the smartest, fastest, strongest, and quite possibly the largest terrestrial carnivore ever.

Spino obviosly would have won larger size, heavier, and he had arms unlike t-rexs stub arms. and about this greater bite force no one has seen a spinosaurus also spinos teeth were like a crocs teeth. crocodiles eat large animals such as water buffalo, and zebras. anyway t-rex couldnt have fitten his large fat mouth around spinos large sail anyway.

I like to think the JP3 Rex was old and weaker XD cause im sure Rex would have the advantage in a fight like that. It gives me peace of mind hahaha

Spinosaurus would win.

I think Spino and rex would win equally, they have their own powerful weapons, Spino could easily rip T. Rex's throat out, and T. rex could easily rip Spino's head off, but if they fight, it will be very even.

In a Rex vs Spino fight, they are so evenly matched, that the battle could last for hours, and be ended by environmental factors, what they are fighting for, and experience. I did a discussion on things that could affect a Rex and Spino fight, but it didn't get that far.

Whoa, this post was from a long time ago, but ok. Some of my views have changed since I made this post. Many of you have probably seen my weight estimates for Spino go up from 4-6 tons to 5-7 tons for example. Now, that said, I still think Tyrannosaurus would win about 60 percent of the time. Spino, about 40. Like MrHappy said, it would likely come down to something out of their own control.

I change my opinion. I think that this is a 50/50. Both were huge and dangerous.

If you look at it,why do we argue about this,can't we just appreciate these amazing creatures,the truth is an even match 50% for each,plus they would never fight cause they lived in separate places.

Rex Fan 684,I know T-Rex is your fave but I wanna know if you can look into spinosaurus and post your findings,he may not beat T-Rex or not, we will never know,I just wanna see what you find when you research it.thank you

If you look at it,why do we argue about this,can't we just appreciate these amazing creatures,the truth is an even match 50% for each,plus they would never fight cause they lived in separate places.

well spino because he was the biggest therapod to walk the earth no giganatosaurus wasnt the biggest spino was even at juvinile he was bigger than a mid aged t-rex

Welcome to the best encyclopedia of dinosaurs ever made! [url=https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ru.globaluse.max.dinosaursencyclopedialight]Download[/url]

I was debating on weather or not to respond, but I got bored. @ penguinsaurusrex Bigger isn't always better. Spinosaurus may be larger (in terms of length and height, and probably weight), but it just wasn't built for combat, in my (and a few others) opinion. Sure, Spinosaurus lived with Charcarodontosaurus, but the difference in their diets allowed for them to co-exist. Rex on the other hand, while it didn't have competition from other large carnivores, it's prey was more than enough to fill that slot. I'm not going to get into facts, if you really want to see pretty much anyone's opinion on how it would go, please refer to previous discussions.

The statement that Tyrannosaurus did not have competition is actually not too truthful. While Nanotyrannus was probably not a problem, a large pack of raptors might at least present a mild problem. Not to mention T-rex had it's own version of Sarcosuchus aka Deinosuchus. Just a thought.

Didn't think of that. I meant more all the time threats, not just once in a while threats.

And that's why Oxalaia is the best Spinosaur. Jk, that is Sigilmassasaurus. I know that this really doesn't relate to Spino vs Oxalaia, but the Argentinian was the second biggest predator of the time, and not the deadliest either. It was a more land based Spinosaur, and was porprotionatly as heavy as Spinosaurus, if not heavier.

What get's me is that this is one of my first discussions ever and it's still kicking, haha My first discussion was about Tyrannosaurus. Nothing more. Just T-rex, haha

I saw that this post was active, so I thought I'd join in for fun. I do think that when it came down to Spino vs T. rex, it would, be very, very even. A little bit on Rex's favor though. If it was Oxalaia vs rex, then it would be different. Okay, its 1 ton less than Spino, and 10 feet shorter, but it lived in the most dangerous place in dinosaur history, and you can't deny that. Argentina was literally crawling with carnivores, and the only food to eat is Titanosaurs. You have to be tough or food.

Well, as I fight writer, I probably shouldn't get involved in this, but what the heck. Why not. Okay, so here are Spinosaurus' advantages Spinosaurus: long and powerful arms, long and sharp claws Longer skull and powerful neck Powerful bite (4-5 t) Heavier and taller Can get up if knocked on its side Stronger (when you have a giant muscular ridge on your back from neck to tail tip, you're strong as hell) Intimidating muscular ridge Possibly some sort of armor (dealt with crocodiles and sharks daily) Swimming ability Way more experience fighting large carnivores (Bahariasaurus, Sauroniops, Sarcosuchus, Carcharodontosaurus, etc.) Possibly reflexes (catching fish flying down a stream requires amazing precision and timing) Now T. Rex's advantages More powerful bite (6-6.5 vs 4-5 t) Deadlier teeth (thicker and serrated) Possibly agility (didn't have the sail, but it did have a restricting short body with wide hips, so this may not be an advantage) Better sense of smell (perhaps the best ever) Possibly better hearing Handled deadly prey (Triceratops, Ankylosaurus) Both had excellent depth perception and intelligence, so those X factors don't come into play. I won't voice my opinion on the outcome, I just stated unbiased and supportable advantages each has.

I must agree with a bite of around 4 tons. It is more than twice athe size of a saltwater crocodile, and they have a bite of around 2 tons. Scale the fact that size matters with bite in crocodile world, and you have a redonculusly strong bite force.

Well, even then, the saltwater crocodiles that had measured bite forces were only 8 feet or so... I imagine Lolong-sized animals would bite down with at least 3 or 3.5t, coming in to the lower range estimates for Tyrannosaurus. If it hit 4, I wouldn't be surprised. I don't know how to do square cube force scaling or whatever like my sister, but scaling from a false gharial, a crocodilian with a 6 foot skull (Sarcosuchus) could bite down with 4t psi. And Spinosaurus' skull was exceptionally more robust than its kin's. Suchomimus skull [img]http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2593/4007208136_bac3269dbf_z.jpg[/img] Gharial skull [img]http://farm1.static.flickr.com/184/423917273_d47d753af0.jpg[/img] Spinosaurus skull [img]http://img.timeinc.net/time/today_in_pictures/0907/tip_ny_0713_01.jpg[/img] False gharial skull [img]http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/wp-content/blogs.dir/471/files/2012/04/i-b1c1e8ccd24e691def253b0847b2bb5e-TS_giant_skull_BMNH.jpg[/img] Spinosaurus is much closer to false gharial than gharial, giving it a bite of roughly 4t, though if its ridge muscles connected to its neck, giving more power to the skull, additional force would be provided.