Comments (Page 568)

I hope its as awsome as your other works

Thanks guys and yes i hope it turns out the way that i intend for it to. ;)

Cool. I'm sure it will be woth the wait.

Hey BBB Hhavent talked to you in a long time:)

looking forward to artwork 

Looking forward to it, I'm sure it'll be worth the wait

Amphiceolias is real

Thanks for sharing there carnosaur, great find. :)

I also think Cats idea is a pretty good idea! 

Thanks guys!

Sorry I didn't post much today. And awesome meme, I actually thought of making a Dino meme when I first joined but I thought people would be mad so I didn't.

Great start. :)

Moved to JW.

I'm with Cat on this one, you should make more about us. 

Preety cool rexfan, You should make another Regular memes, as many more have joined and left

did you make those drawings? there preety cool, and id say TITANOLODON

This is the reason I use their whole names, and not just the genus.

I want this to be a thing now. (except that I know the comment section of that video would be full of screaming fanboys)

Nice start, looking forward to more. 

Thanks Alejandro. I love to make memes, lol

Haha that's pretty funny, awesome meme Rex Fan

I agree with Carnosaur about Mapu being larger than 10-12 meters as there is some evidence that points to Mapu being about 14 meters at the most but I do not agree with you saying that it was larger than Giga even though evidence points to the fact that the upper estimates for both are around 14 meters, but the average estimates of most paleontologists for Giga tend to be larger than Mapu.

Good start.

Thanks.

Indeed.

I totally agree with you and Carnosaur, there are so many factors that could have distorted a footprint, like erosion as Carnosaur mentioned.

Also, Carnosaur mentioned footprints being a bad thing to estimate size with. He's right. I did a post about it a while back...

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/community/forums/topic/29170

Ok thanks

I for one don't use the toe bone as evidence. I use specimens like Celeste, which is somewhat complete.

Ok, cool. I'd say you could mention them, but mention the evidence is scanty at best ;)

But we take the toe bone and other fragmentary tyrannosaurs as evidence? and not more decently preserved remains?

You simply cannot do that.

Also, there's no need to be agitated. It's called debate for a reason ;)

@HHP how is it unreliable?

Thanks Hiphopananomous.

And Rex Fan, thanks for asking, my paper is mainly focusing on the eating habits of sauropods, but I also have a section on the largest sauropods and I was wondering whether or not there is enough proof for me to include sauropods like Bruhathkayosaurus and Amphicoelias in my paper

Yeah, the evidence is far unreliable. 

Because that "evidence" is scanty. 

Anyways, I'll draw my own conclusions thank you.

Nice Rex Fan, pretty funny. 

Thanks MrHappy

Glad you liked it ;)

Thanks SciFi!

Exactly! and "she" is aorund the 10.5 meter mark. If i remember correctly i said the lower bound estimates for tyrannosaurus were 11 meters...

you and HHP misread me. Why such deflated estimates for Mapu( 10-12 meters) when we have evidence of a select few individuals exceeding that size?

Is it focussing on one species of sauropod in particular or the whole group?

Great meme!