c rex and f rex mystery ..... solved for good!!!

Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
MemberCompsognathusOctober 25, 20133148 Views21 Replies so i have been scrolling lately through older posts and i read one that really interested me, the one where dinofights says that f rex and c rex are carcharodontosaurs at first glance i thought he was right, then i thought " if it really did exist then why are tyrannosaur fossils much richer than this giant." so i decided to start a thorough investigation. one thing that proved that sadly they weren't carcharosontosaurs is that the teeth fragments there were defintely tyrannosaur because they were rounded something only present in tyrannosaurs. by then i was starting to feel comfortable that they were just large tyrannosaurus rexes , but then again i had to be sure so i examined there other bone proportions there was only one creature that matched them tyrannosaurus X the mystery tyrannosaurus species. in another older discussion about that most of us agreed that those speciemens of X are proportionally longer than rex so by then i wanted to know even more. i read an article published by the man who started the x debate dr robert bakker where he mentioned that the x specimens were:
mor 980 aka riby rex= 11.9 m (39 ft) much shorter skull than sue relatively
mor 008 = 13.1 (43 ft ) m the largest known published trex 6% larger skull than sue smaller maxilla
stan= 12.1 m (40 ft) smaller skull than sue almost same size
mor 1152-1126 aka F REX and C REX= 14.8-14 m (48.2-46 ft ) proportionally longer head than sue smaller mandabile
by then i was sure that they both were X's i hope you like my points and please tell me your thoughts:)
pics
[img]http://www.weebly.com/uploads/2/3/6/6/23660276/2708289_orig.jpg[/img]