Jurassic World Movie News

c rex and f rex mystery ..... solved for good!!!

Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700

MemberCompsognathusOctober 25, 20133148 Views21 Replies
so i have been scrolling lately through older posts and i read one that really interested me, the one where dinofights says that f rex and c rex are carcharodontosaurs at first glance i thought he was right, then i thought " if it really did exist then why are tyrannosaur fossils much richer than this giant." so i decided to start a thorough investigation. one thing that proved that sadly they weren't carcharosontosaurs is that the teeth fragments there were defintely tyrannosaur because they were rounded something only present in tyrannosaurs. by then i was starting to feel comfortable that they were just large tyrannosaurus rexes , but then again i had to be sure so i examined there other bone proportions there was only one creature that matched them tyrannosaurus X the mystery tyrannosaurus species. in another older discussion about that most of us agreed that those speciemens of X are proportionally longer than rex so by then i wanted to know even more. i read an article published by the man who started the x debate dr robert bakker where he mentioned that the x specimens were: mor 980 aka riby rex= 11.9 m (39 ft) much shorter skull than sue relatively mor 008 = 13.1 (43 ft ) m the largest known published trex 6% larger skull than sue smaller maxilla stan= 12.1 m (40 ft) smaller skull than sue almost same size mor 1152-1126 aka F REX and C REX= 14.8-14 m (48.2-46 ft ) proportionally longer head than sue smaller mandabile by then i was sure that they both were X's i hope you like my points and please tell me your thoughts:) pics [img]http://www.weebly.com/uploads/2/3/6/6/23660276/2708289_orig.jpg[/img]
User Avatar
Deltadromeus
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
Wow, that's cool. I didn't think that they where Tyrannosaurus rex. They did have a sudo Carcharodontosaur skull, not a T. rex skull. I classify T x as a different species, but I wonder, wasn't t x lighter than T. rex? If so, than C rex and F rex would only be about as heavy, even though 5 feet longer.

Hi

User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
yes delta you are right i put them at 5-7 tons on my website
User Avatar
Deltadromeus
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
Is there a link or links or pictures or something that you could give us to prove it. I believe things pretty easily, but I know that other people don't. Is there something you could show us to back up what you said or something? Maybe even a picture of C Rex's tooth would be nice.

Hi

User Avatar
DinoSteve93
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
Cool, that proves Rex Fan's and my theory. I just thought from the beginning they were T-rexes. Sincerelly I couldn't see the carcharodontosaurid features in their skull :P

Proud founder of the site Theropods Wiki! www.theropods.wikia.com

User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
yes dino steve you are right i also could not see the carcharodontosaur features there they 100% tyrannosaur.
User Avatar
Deltadromeus
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
Well, I could. The skull wasn't as sloped as it normally is. Not as much as a Carcharodontosaurs,but more than your average Tyrannosaurus rex.

Hi

User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
well delta the amount of individual variation in tyrannosaurs is immense for example wrankel rex has extremely small eye balls and arms etc. but you can't consider it another genus or what if it had just been distorted?
User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
ohh by the way i'm dying to hear rex fan;s reaction about this :)
User Avatar
DinoSteve93
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
Haha, he will be surelly very happy to hear that! PS- (Rex Fan, our theory gets proofs, slowly, but it gets, haha ;) )

Proud founder of the site Theropods Wiki! www.theropods.wikia.com

User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
hey delta i found a partialt tooth fragment from c rex not f rex here it is:) [img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/12/article-0-0F2541C500000578-815_468x655.jpg[/img]
User Avatar
DinoSteve93
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
Yes, it is clearly too thick to be a carcharodontosaurid tooth.

Proud founder of the site Theropods Wiki! www.theropods.wikia.com

User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
so this proves my point:)
User Avatar
Deltadromeus
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
That's a tyrannosaur all right.

Hi

User Avatar
Gigadino
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
MOR008 isn't that big his skull it's "just" 1,34 m. Still a big beast though but still smaller than "Sue".
User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
no his skull is actually 150 cm long compared to sue 144 cm according to this paper [url=http://palaeoblog.blogspot.com/2006/04/new-biggest-t-rex-skull.html]Your text to link here...[/url]
User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
anyway this is about mor 1126 and mor 1152 not mor 008
User Avatar
Gigadino
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
MOR008 have a skull "only" 1,34 m long. Look: https://1kvzgw.bn1.livefilestore.com/y1pZuAhVuYWYM2YxliLrpNUW9mZWHvG39B2LchKtp8ooOVdbeTd6INTZDpNXTmIxyCzo2M1Jv8Jf898xZ_haCA0DnkprnydhGRg/mor008.gif The original and wrong recostruction is too long. Ther eal skull is shorter.
User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
ohh yes you are right but based on mor 980 proportions mor 008 would measure around 12.5 m long still very LONG. anyway i hope you like my theory overall :)
User Avatar
Rex Fan 684
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
I KNEW THEY WEREN'T CARCHARODONTOSAURS! They could be "Tyrannosaurus X", or they could just be T-rex with slight variations in the skull design. That tooth is without a doubt tyrannosaurid. If T-X is longer, but lighter than T-rex, I'd say a 45-50 ft T-X would weigh roughly 7-8.5 tons, while a T-rex at that length would weight 9-12 tons or so. Great job Raptorexxx :)
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names." ―Alpha-98
User Avatar
Dynamosaurus Imperiosus/ Raptorexxx 700
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile
hey by the way i am drawing a sketch of celeste that will be posted roughly by tom hope you like it

Join the discussion!



New Forum Topics
Recently Active Forums
Jurassic World Rebirth
Jurassic World RebirthDiscuss the new Jurassic World film by Gareth Edwards!
Jurassic World
Jurassic WorldDiscuss Jurassic World Here
Dinosaurs
DinosaursTalk About Dinosaurs
Jurassic World Merchandise
Jurassic World MerchandiseDiscuss Jurassic World merchandise here
Hot Forum Topics
Highest Forum Ranks Unlocked
WhyJUSTWHY3746
WhyJUSTWHY3746 » Compsognathus
15% To Next Rank
J_D_AGGIE
J_D_AGGIE » Compsognathus
12% To Next Rank
Joshua_arkan
Joshua_arkan » Compsognathus
10% To Next Rank
Latest Media
Scified Community Stats

Scified hosts a network of online communities containing 406,756 posts by 48,486 members (11 are online now). The Jurassic World Rebirth Forum is the most recently active forum. The latest Forum topic added was: Wallpaper from the computer screen in the lab scene?

664 people are currently online

Join the discussion!
Please sign in to access your profile features!
(Signing in also removes ads!)



Forgot Password?
Scified Website LogoYour sci-fi community, old-school & modern
Hosted Fansites
AlienFansite
GodzillaFansite
PredatorFansite
Main Menu
Community
Sci-Fi Movies
Help & Info
+

Sign In to contribute!