Comments (Page 467)
Latest comments by Jurassic World fans on news, forum discussions and images!
Not too awesome... Not to mention that supposedly if you were depressed in life you would forever be at the bottom of the river, always being in eternal hot darknes... THe book is quite offensive, messed up, and not right.
Yes but the cryos are slowed down by the snow.
A walrus is not something that can be called "agile" "graceful" or "fast." On land at least.
The walrus outweighs them. 4,500 pounds vs 750 pounds.............
Go mini Cryolophosaurus go! Go mini Cryolophosaurus go!
Your 100th post? You're already at over 1,000.
Can I have one of them to ride into battle?
Ugh, you obiviously have no idea what I'm talking about, it's not your special place in hell, it's just a section of hell as Dante describes it. From the way you're talking you probably didn't even know what I was talking about.
Circle 7, Round 1 of Dante's Inferno is the section of hell where the people have to suffer continuous drowning in a boiling hot river of blood, and those who attempt to escape are shot with arrows by centaurs.
It is a mini cryolophosaurs and I pot the fight bit by bit.
Is it up to us to finish the battle or did you hit post early, or something else?
Anyways, pack of six Cryolophosaurus would ruin a Walrus if its on land.
ahh my old stomping grounds.
A special place in hell Mr. happy? WHy I know the PERFECT place...
Circle 7, Round 1 of Dante's Inferno...
i sorta got in trouble..........
that is what i am doing for my 100th post.....................
Thanks guys!
Also, I won't be posting DDD battles for a few weeks. Like I did before, I'm taking a little break after 5 battles.
(Also, what if I did all the dinosaurs battling each other in one fight for the series finale?)
I'll see ya there Mystique ;)
I mainly came up with this because..
1. I was bored
and
2. Forum seemed slow so I thought of starting a little joke up too get the forum going again
Rooting for Spino! Good fight!
oh my god! i do the exact same thing. and people ask why. forget my last post. i understood right after i posted it.
Nice fight, but I was actually rooting for Oxalaia this time.
You got me for a moment...
There's a special place in hell for people like you. I'm looking forward to meeting you there.
Joking aside, had me going, I'll be honest. We all need a laugh every now and then.
Sorry about that. I didn't want the site to log me out. It's on now! :)
Where is the fight?
Yo really had me goin for a moment there. But, then you let me down.
The reason a croc weighs more then a lion is because of sheer physical size.
PRIMAL KING - I happen to agree with your assessment. A dissertation forwarded by one nof National Geographic's foremost paleontological groups recently stated that Spinosaurus' wait was likely between seven and nine tons - which reflects the small size of its hind limbs and the lighter mass of its torso. Of course, this is pure speculation; that animal could have weighed upwards of 15 tons for all we know! However, it stands to reason that a weight of roughly 7.5 or so tons is most accurate. :)
Interesting PK.
Off topic, I can't help but snicker because prior to this new discovery about Spino, someone said Spino was the most land based Spinosaur of them all. Now, after this discovery, not so much.
I predict that there will be a male T.rex in JW, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were more than one T.rex, and hopefully there will be a female, just to keep things interesting.
^Dang, Sci-Fi King. That one's sick.
I don't care about the risks, I'm still a minor, I won't die, because its Jurassic Park!!! Haha, kidding aside, even with the risks I'd still do a safari like that.
I would agree on everything on this list, however, there is one problem I have with it, and it belongs to #1, Spinosaurus. At the museum I've checked out exclusive pictures of the bones, and although it still belongs in at least the top 5, if not 3, it was not 12 tons in weight. Rather, 6-8.45 tons. The ribs and hips are the biggest tell-tale for this, the hips and legs (dense as they were) would take some serious, unrealistic musculature to hold up a body of that weight. Secondly, the ribs did not extend "outwards" which would show us a weight such as you have suggested. Instead they "curved" backwards, near barely distended, and more stream-lined. It was more built like modern gharials, who have surprisingly thin, shrunken skeletons. Not quite like a Nile Crocodile. I believe it should be tied with Tyrannosaurus for the #1 slot. Still a bump up in size, just not so greatly so.











