Worst dinosaur documenteries

5796 Views46 Replies
Forum Topic

Tyrant king

MemberCompsognathusAug-26-2014 5:31 PM

So this is my list..... I don't have pics so...

VALLEY OF T.REX.  Why you ask?

1. The t.rex is a scavenger.

2. The t.rex is a scavenger.

3. T.rex is a scavenger.

 

ANIMAL ARMEGGEDON

1. The rex has pronated arms

2.the rex was ugly(this is my opinion)

2.. It was stupid. It charged a triceratops head on and got impaled. 

MONSTERS RECONSTRUCTIED. Oh we're to begin.

1. Spino was god ills sized

2. It killed a rugops in one bite.

3. It one shotted a carcaradontosaurs.

4.it disemboweled a sacrosucus

5. The grass was cut.

6. It got killed a rugops pack l

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

Hmm... How about Monsters resurrected: Spinosaurus?

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
G. H. (Gman)
Group: Admin
Rank: Tyrannosaurus Rex
View Profile

Already the Rex and Spino have been introduced in this topic. Tread lightly ladies and gentlemen.

I am watching.

"'Nostalgic' does not equal 'good,' and 'standards' does not equal 'elitism.'" "Being offended is inevitable. Living offended is your choice."
User Avatar
Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

It alright.

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

I didn't even brign Rex up... You know what, I'll just edit my last post. That documentary was just bad, they just depcited Dinosaurs as full out violent creatures, just monsters.

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
G. H. (Gman)
Group: Admin
Rank: Tyrannosaurus Rex
View Profile

Raptor,
I wasn't specifically targeting anyone, rather noting that most outbursts get started with those two dinosaurs. You mentioned one, the OP mentioned the other. Just be light on your toes.

"'Nostalgic' does not equal 'good,' and 'standards' does not equal 'elitism.'" "Being offended is inevitable. Living offended is your choice."
User Avatar
Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I know and I try to be careful.

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

I will, but we're just talkign documentaries here.

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

What are your resonings for monsters reconstructed.

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

Because it was extremely scientifically inaccurate, not to mention it had a generally bad depiction of dinosaurs.

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Did you notice the grass that was mowed?

User Avatar
Sci-Fi King25
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

I've only seen Monsters Ressurected: Spinosaurus, and the Spino was WAAAY to OP.

“Banana oil.”- George Takei, Gigantis: The Fire Monster

User Avatar
Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

it was so stupid.

User Avatar
Lord Vader
Group: Member
Rank: Tyrannosaurus Rex
View Profile

I've seen Monsters Resurrected: Spino, and I agree, it was OP as hell. Talk about life hacks there. 

Jack of all trades. Master of none

User Avatar
Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Haha the scarcharadontosaurus was to skinny.

User Avatar
Lord Vader
Group: Member
Rank: Tyrannosaurus Rex
View Profile

The Spino was too damn big. To deny that would be to deny that we live in planet Earth. That Spino was way too big, there's no way around. Carcharodontosaurus was every bit as big as Spino if you ask me, and Rugops was 30 feet long, more than half Spino's length (if you ask me). Nothing can pick up something more than half it's length and shake it around so easily. 

Jack of all trades. Master of none

User Avatar
Tyrant king
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Ikr.

User Avatar
Carnosaur
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Monsters resurrected covered over dinosaurs as well, it portrayed Acrocanthosaurus alright, but megalania(giant prehistoric lizard) it showed as an oversized landshark, killing everything it came across. The spino episode wasn't too bad; with the exception of the Carcharodontosaurus section( it most likely didn't use the "slapping" offensive it was portrayed as posessing. A lot of inaccuracies regarding size as well. Rugops was more like 18 feet - thirty feet is assuming the holotype was a juvenile, which it probably wasn't. It's teeth were small, it's skull was horrifically weak when dealing with high pressues in the skull or lateral torsion, all which points to a scavenger; i wonder why Jack horner didn't take those points into consideration when thinking Tyrannosaurus was a scavenger?

With that said, Valley of the T. rex was hands down one of the most horrific attempts at a scientific outlook on Tyrannosaurus being a scavenger. For one, no terrestrial carnivore to ever exist on the fact of our little blue planet has scavenged 100% the entirety of its life. An animal designed for that would go extinct within a few generations. Secondly,. the tibula being longer then the fibula = slow runner hypothesis is bogus. Horses have this, and can reach speeds of 35 mph. Thirdly, an animal with an acute sense of smell doesn't mean its a scavenger. Smell is a vital part in hunting, but i guess he glazed over that.

He stated he wanted people to think differently, that the beloved Tyrannosaurus wasn't just a killing maching; and he's right. But, he went at it way to wrong. It's safe to say tyrannosaurus killed its prey, as we have evidence of prey animals escaping the attack(hadrosaur bones show signs of Tyrannosaur teeth, wounds evidently healed over) But, it most certainly wouldn't pass up a carcass when it saw it.

Going back to Monsters Resurrected, Spinosaurus in fact probably could pick up a rugops, but not shake it like it did. That was based on the assumption Spinosaurs killed like crocodiles, mainly because the skull is similar. Tests conducted on Spinosaurus' reconstructed skull show that it's skull would have multiple hairline fractures if it killed like it was portrayed to. 

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

User Avatar
Allotitan
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

i agree those were some pretty stupid documentaries

When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Tell life I don't want you're damn lemons, and then squeeze them into life's eyes!

User Avatar
Spinosaurus Rex
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

There is one documentary i absolutely dredded, but i cant remember the name for the life of me. 

User Avatar
Silver_Falcon
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Yeah, animal armageddon's rex is absolutely disgusting, but it's not nearly as bad as this one:

Here, have a waffle (-'.')-#

User Avatar
Spinosaurus Rex
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

Ive never heard of Valley of the Trex or Dinosaur Armageddon, maybe i dont know them because obviously they are horrible!

User Avatar
Carnosaur
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I never saw Dinosaur Armageddon, but i'm watching it now, and i kid you not, the narrator said "thousands of millions of tons of rock and ice"....

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

User Avatar
Raptor-401
Group: Member
Rank: Allosaurus
View Profile

@Carnosaur

*Reads your post

Me: wat?

IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!

User Avatar
Carnosaur
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

there, haha i edited it....better?

 

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

User Avatar
Spinosaurus Rex
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

When i saw the ice and rock part, i was like 
"no thank you" lol

User Avatar
dinoboy22
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

@silver falcon what the heck is that from?

User Avatar
Silver_Falcon
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I don't even know. I don't think I want to know either, but apparently it is a T. rex.

Here, have a waffle (-'.')-#

User Avatar
Carnosaur
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

that, my friends, is the product of a Tyrannosaurus and a Ceratosaurus...well..i'll let y'all but  2 and 2 together

Nature doesn't deceive us; it is we who deceive ourselves.

User Avatar
dinoboy22
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

is it bad that i like it? lol it looks like something out of fossil fighters or monster hunter

User Avatar
Silver_Falcon
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

You haven't seen the end of the tail yet.

Although, it wouldn't be a bad monster in monster hunter... But the guy who made it says it's a rex, so... :I

Here, have a waffle (-'.')-#

Join the discussion!



Jurassic World Movies Forums
Jurassic World Rebirth
Jurassic World RebirthDiscuss the new Jurassic World film by Gareth Edwards!
Jurassic World
Jurassic WorldDiscuss Jurassic World Here
Dinosaurs
DinosaursTalk About Dinosaurs
Jurassic World Merchandise
Jurassic World MerchandiseDiscuss Jurassic World merchandise here
New Forum Topics
Hot Forum Topics
Highest Forum Ranks Unlocked
Xenotaris
Xenotaris » Allosaurus
90% To Next Rank
Latest Media
Community Stats
This Jurassic World Movies community is part of the Scified network. Scified hosts a network of online fan-site communities containing 406,137 posts by 48,399 members (9 are online now). The Jurassic World Rebirth Forum is the most recently active forum. The latest Forum topic added was: Jurassic World Rebirth DVD & Blu-Ray release date
VIPWhat are VIP?AdminModeratorSpecial TitleMember
Join the discussion!
Please sign in to access your profile features!



Forgot Password?

Log in to view your personalized notifications across Scified!

Scified Website LogoScified is the Hub for Sci-Fi Movie Fandoms
Hosted Fansites
AlienFansite
GodzillaFansite
PredatorFansite
Main Menu
Community
Sci-Fi Movies
Help & Info
+

Sign In to contribute!