could 6 utahraptors beat a t.rex

Six utahs destroy rex

Well. Seeing as you guys didn't answer my question why should i answer yours!

Utahraptor may win one v one but it would be something like 90/10 in favor of the rex.

Same goes for spino, they're just too big for one dromeaosaur - as big as utahraptor is - to manage. Droms aren't very adept at killing things substaintially bigger then them in a one v once scenario

Relax, let's just ignore that and keep on subject.

Ive seen a good number of sites that put Utah at around a ton or a little bit bigger.

@HPP I didn't ignore your comment

MAYBE WE COULD JUST SAY THEY BOTH HAVEE GOOD CHANCES OF WINING

But they wouldn't.........

Well Hipho if it's that type of question just PM Carno, let's keep it on topic here.

Catzilla, calm down nothing that bad is happening, really.

Wikipedia exerpt:

"The largest described U. ostrommaysorum specimens are estimated to have reached up to 7 m (23 ft) long and somewhat less than 500 kg (1,100 lb) in weight"

i don't like wikipedia really, but there's more sources for Utahraptor being under a ton...i'll have to do some digging

Sorry forgot to turn off the caps button

One v one, a better opponent for Utahraptor would be Allosaurus Fragilis

Catzilla isn't on this tthread

and Utah wins this easily

Wait, so Utah was closer to half a ton? Six Utah vs one Rex is a suicide mission for Utah. Sorry to say, but R.I.P. Utahraptor pack. 

Its just a differance of opinions here guys ;) And whoever brought Spino into this, dont bother thinking youll get an answer, that was a very stupid question to ask and can get you reported, you could have chose any other dinosaur to compare, but what you chose to compare was Spino.

.

How about carnotaurs 

Mr happy I disagree Utahans would win easily

No. This was purely Rex, so no, no predators other than Rex and Utah. 

You can think what you want, but don't tell me I'm wrong. 

Utahans would win easily I said

Yeah, P-X it's quite childish to tell one other "party" that they're wrong and act smug about it.

I'm not saying your wrong!!

I know what you said, and the way you said implies that I'm wrong. 

You did a while ago.

"One party is wrong. ;)"

You typed that I believe.

Don't now what you guys are talking about but I am sorry

We are all wrong to an extent, we can't be sure abot something untill we seeit, maybe rex wahs bigger utahs smarter, the awnsere is that we don't know ho would win, we can only make assumptions and gueeses

Yes, I forgot about that, we're basing this off educated assumptions, but in the end, they are just mere assumpstions.

Yes but 1500 pounds beating 8 tons  not a fair fight

Catzilla - JRR i guess now: That's what we're debating right now. Hence, why we are actually..

Mr.Happy: perhaps not, six would be enough imo. Droms are smart, and they can use their numbers to flank the rex, or have some distract while others attack.

One v one, that would be a suicide mission

That is quite the childish act to lie about what i just saw you post a few minutes ago PX, dont play that game, i dont like liers.

I SAID SORRY!!!!!!!!!!! 

Well im just going to stick with my belief and you others can stick to yours, no questions asked.

Perhaps Carno. Just the same, Rex might be a bit much for them. If they're desperate, that's why they're attacking the Rex. If they're not desperate, they have no reason to attack. 

You know what, I agree with what fact Dude just said.

quoting my sig. ''Everybodie has difrent opinions and you can't change that''

drop it. No use in beating the dead horse.

The theropod database(quite reliable imo) had this to say on utahraptor:

Holotype- (CEU 184v.86) pedal ungual II
Paratypes- (BYU 9429) (3.89 m) mid caudal vertebrae (67 mm)
(BYU 9435) distal caudal vertebra
(BYU 9436) distal caudal vertebra
(BYU 9438) pedal ungual II
(BYU 13068) pedal ungual II
(CEU 184v.260) (5.03 m) tibia (503 mm)
(CEU 184v.294) pedal ungual II
(CEU 184v.400) premaxilla
Referred- (BYU 15465) (~5.9 m) femur (600 mm) (Erickson et al., 2009)
(BYU coll.) teeth (Kirkland et al., 2005)
(BYU and CEU coll.) (at least nine individuals; juvenile to adult; ~3-5.6 m, some ~11 m?) 190 elements including premaxillae, nasal, quadratojugal, cervical vertebrae, dorsal vertebrae, sacral vertebrae, proximal caudal vertebrae, coracoid, partial ilium, incomplete ischium, femora (310-565 mm), astragalus, metatarsal II, phalanx II-1, metatarsal III, metatarsal IV (Britt et al., 2001) 

PX, you also said you have no idea what im talikng about, so man up and say you did what you clearly did and THEN say sorry, because your appology means nothing right now if you cant clarify what you said.

leave me alone I said SORRY I really must have pissed you off 

Apparently you didnt read my whole comment or you purely just dont understand.