The JP Tyrannosaur "Plot-hole" debunked

Primal King
MemberCompsognathusMarch 24, 2014Locked8681 Views104 RepliesSo there is a famous plot hole of the Tyrannosaurus escape in which the T. rex escpaes then knocks the explorer down a large concrete moat that randomly appeared. The Tyrannosaur should have fallen in the moat or not have evn escaped. So here is the explanation for it:
So if you look at the diagram, the Tyrannosaur actually flips the Ford and shoves to the right. Then he knocks it over the side, next to Pole 3, while the T. rex escaped between Pole 1 and 2. When the car falls, to can see the hill in which the Tyrannosaur stood on to escape. In the book the Tyrannosaurus actually has a similar hill. The "moat" is actually a hill or plateau, probably built becaus the cars were supposed to stop farther down the road, but the power outage had different ideas. So, hope that explains things!
Btw,....
ALL HAIL THE KING
"If you can't see it... It's already too late."
-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)
That last fight had nothing to do with people stating what they thought was fact, it started with demeaning pictures, and you know that. Look im sorry for overreacting about that discussion, but not for the part where me and S-Rex stood up to Carnosaur. What S-Rex said to Chris was very ballsy and it shouldnt take guts for anybody to say what they need to say, and he thought he needed to say what he did and felt no remorse for being banned, and niether should anybody else for what they believe in.
Well that is somewhat of a good point, but to avoid furhter fight I will leave no comment, I would like it so I do NOT offend ANYONE, EVER. I like to gain respect from everybody, no matter how much they are hated by other regulars.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
S-Rex's comment in that one was unnessaesary if you ask me. By demeaning, you are reffering to the limited Spino jokes that were posted (and then later on, the ones from Carnosaur), correct? Did you even look at all the T-Rex jokes there? We were having fun there, making fun of pretty much exclusively T-Rex.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Yes, but you still can't deny the fact that you guys were still trying to piss off the SPino fans and were using T-Rex jokes as a defense.
I shall leave no further comment about that.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
I wasn't trying to piss anybody off when I posted that first Spino joke. If you guys think you know how I think, I'd love to hear it because I don't know how I think and I would love to know.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
I was referring to someone else...
I think you are just normal and like to hear people's opinions but get mad if it is different than yours for a dumb and biased reason.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
Everybody has made fun of trex for his arms, and yes, we have obvious evidence he did have tiny arms, its something everybody can agree to as funny. Now the joke you posted saying the largest carnivorous dinosaurs only eats fish obviously was something not everybody could agree on, thats a theory that hasent been proven and you know that.
If it's dumb and biased, yes. If they give reasons for it, that's a different story. Sorry of I seem a bit ticked right now, it's almost midnight here and I like my sleep.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Then why don't you sleep.
FACT DUDE< but it's a joke. Jokes shouldn't be taken as scientific fact.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
It was a joke, you know that. Obviously Spino didn't survive strictly off fish, but that likely made a good chunk of its diet.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
I agree with that Mr. Happy. And I am a Spino fan and I thought that Spino joke was hilarious. I don't think anyone was trying to start a fight. Everyone should relax about it. It is one persons opinion and it was a joke forum. It was meant to make people laugh. A lot of them were funny. Just try not to let it get out of hand. Sorry if this offends anyone. It is just my opinion.
"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self." - Ernest Hemingway.
I agree with that Mr. Happy. And I am a Spino fan and I thought that Spino joke was hilarious. I don't think anyone was trying to start a fight. Everyone should relax about it. It is one persons opinion and it was a joke forum. It was meant to make people laugh. A lot of them were funny. Just try not to let it get out of hand. Sorry if this offends anyone. It is just my opinion.
"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self." - Ernest Hemingway.
I agree with that Mr. Happy. And I am a Spino fan and I thought that Spino joke was hilarious. I don't think anyone was trying to start a fight. Everyone should relax about it. It is one persons opinion and it was a joke forum. It was meant to make people laugh. A lot of them were funny. Just try not to let it get out of hand. Sorry if this offends anyone. It is just my opinion.
"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self." - Ernest Hemingway.
I hate repeat comments.
"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self." - Ernest Hemingway.
Yah, but there were some others who wanted to start a fight, and they WERE NOT Spino fans. They wee using "mean" language.
IT'S TIME TO DU-DU-DU-DU-DUEL!!!
That is probably true raptor. Some people just want to start fights. And yes they were using "mean" language.
"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self." - Ernest Hemingway.
Its just ive been put into the elements of reverse pshychology a lot in my lifetime, so it doesnt take much for me to pickup its scent, and in most cases ive been put into, my accusations are usually correct. This is the way i looked at that discussion, from the beginning, yes it was meant for jokes, so this is what i thought, not that its true, but normally i come out on top on these kind of things. Since it was for making jokes, you, Mr Happy, thought that you could let off a little steam or throw out an indirect (hidden) insult towards Spinosaurus. So since the discussion started out as a sincere joke topic, you could squeeze it in making it seem as a joke, which i caught onto as soon as i came past it, then you proceeded by saying it was just a joke and all of the people that doesnt catch onto reverse psychology like i do will foresee what you say is true. Like i said, im not saying what i say is true, nor am i saying that you will immediately fess up if i am right or if you will at all.