Forum Topic

Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexJun-08-2013 7:07 PMBefore the diehard Spino fans complain, I will do a Why Spino is better discussion. Now that that's out of the way, let's go. T-Rex had the obvious bite force advantage (I know, but it's true). T-Rex's teeth were designed to crush bone. It likely had binocular vision, and I have read it could see heat signatures (not sure if it is true not, just like how it could only see movement). T-Rex probably had thick, leathery skin that could give some protection against a bite. It also was smarter than most (if not all) large predators.
Add any information in the comments, tell me if something is wrong, and just enjoy the debate.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
40 Replies

Dinosaur.Fanatic
MemberCompsognathusJun-09-2013 7:48 PM@futurepaleantologist
I said nothing about binocular vision. As I stated, Rex wouldn't have required acute eyesight because he would be out in the open.
"Either way, you probably won't get off this island alive."
--Alan Grant

futurepaleontologist1
MemberCompsognathusJun-09-2013 11:10 PMOh, sorry. :(. Who was that then?... But, if I may follow up on your open plains thing: Tyrannosaurus still would need to look out for obstacles like large rocks, fallen trees etc. It didn't require great eyesight, but T. Rexes may not have been good enough. Btw I am NOT a spino fan. I don't think either Rex or Spino was better, I'm just bringing some stuff up.
Pity is for the living. Envy is for the dead.
-Mark Twain

Dinosaur.Fanatic
MemberCompsognathusJun-10-2013 11:28 AMThat's fine. It's eyesight may not have been that good, but most likely it was. Notice that most animal's senses are usually attuned not only to get food, but also to their surroundings. I strongly believe that T-rex's eyesight would have been strong enough for it's surroundings. And again, large rocks and fallen trees would most likely not be found in the middle of plains. Well...maybe rocks, but you get the idea.
Yes, I know you are neither Team Rex or Spino - you are Team Carchar. Don't let me get in the way of your opinion. :)
"Either way, you probably won't get off this island alive."
--Alan Grant

Rex Fan 684
MemberCompsognathusJun-10-2013 11:47 AMTyrannosaurus almost certainly had good binocular vision. Futurepaleontologist1, you said earlier that Allosaurus' eyes were similar to Tyrannosaurus' and it had bad vision. Allo had eyes placed more to the side while Rex had forward facing eyes like a wolf or lion.
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names."
―Alpha-98

futurepaleontologist1
MemberCompsognathusJun-10-2013 10:25 PMI thought Allo's were slightly closer. I didn't really say they were the same as Rexes eyes, they were just binocular.
Pity is for the living. Envy is for the dead.
-Mark Twain

Rex Fan 684
MemberCompsognathusJun-11-2013 11:28 AMWell, they did not have binocular vision. Their vision was similar to some tyrannosaurs like Albertosaurus, but not as good as T-rex's. The eyes faced forward and were closer than many herbivores, but were pretty standard when it came to the predators. Tyrannosaurus had unusually good vision for a big carnivore.
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names."
―Alpha-98

Jonosaurus Rex
MemberCompsognathusJun-14-2013 5:04 PMTyrannosaurus Rex would win because of superior bite force. T. Rex's bite force was the largest in the animal kingdom (over 5000lbs, 2x more than a saltwater crocodile) and its teeth were specifically designed to crush through Triceratops horn and Ankylosaur armour. By comparison, the teeth of Spinosaurus and other large theropods like Giganotosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus were like giant meat hooks, great for holding the prey with its jaw, but the larger claws did most of the work. In addition, T. Rex possesed a mouthfull of bacteria which would infect bitemarks. So even if the bite from T. Rex didn't kill the prey, the biological weaponry would...

Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexJun-14-2013 9:24 PMI don't think even the largest of T-Rex could bite through an Ankylosaurus's armour. A Trike's horn would be a battle, but it is possible. More than anything, the teeth could crush bone if it got a good bite in. What is going to help T-Rex against Ankylosaurus is intelligence. T-Rex would probably leave Ankylosaurus alone unless it was desperate.
Jack of all trades. Master of none

Rex Fan 684
MemberCompsognathusJun-15-2013 12:28 PMProbably. If it was hungry enough, it would be smart enough to realize that if it flipped the ankylosaur, it would be an easy meal. That's where Tyrannosaurus' intelligence comes into play.
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names."
―Alpha-98

Rex Fan 684
MemberCompsognathusJun-15-2013 12:28 PMProbably. If it was hungry enough, it would be smart enough to realize that if it flipped the ankylosaur, it would be an easy meal. That's where Tyrannosaurus' intelligence comes into play.
"Men like me don't start the wars. We just die in them. We've always died in them, and we always will. We don't expect any praise for it, no parades. No one knows our names."
―Alpha-98
Add A Reply