Comments (Page 1,178)

@Makaveli7, what happend to the gauntlet series.

@MrHappy9097 possibly. @Deltadromeus15 nice name and I will do Bradycneme

It's not a catchy name, but this dinosaur deserves it: Serpentinethantus Snake death Pronounced: Serp- en-tine-e-than-tus

Let me do the math, that is a head that was 7.1 feet long. Why did it get sold before anyone could really look at it. People must know how big Giganotosaurus could get, if it is Giganotosaurus.

I want to see you do Bradycneme

Well that sucks, this dinosaur is really cool, and it doesn't even have a name, I will be right back to name this beast his unofficial name.

That's pretty interesting. Would you consider Guanlong forgotten?

Upcoming: Placidatitan Triassic Kraken Das Monster von Minden Montanatherium If you have any suggestions, message me and I'll include it

Thanks! Next fight coming the day after tomorrow.

It was estimated at anywhere from 48-54 feet, and may not be a Giganotosaurus at all but rather some new carcharodontosaur. It was described as likely being one and was said to be at least 50 feet long and then was sold. But can you imagine how big the skull of a 50+ foot Giganotosaurus was? If a 43 foot one has a 6.4 foot skull.... Man. That's just flat out impressive.

As always this has a great and creative story :)

I don't think all dinosaurs were 100% feathery. Yutyrannus, a 30 foot long tyrannosaur, had feathers, but Carnotaurus, a comparably sized dinosaur, did not judging by skin imprints of the side and skull. We know that most, if not all, dromaeosaurs had feathers judging by well preserved imprints. Ceratopsians had protofeather quills on their backs as well. I don't think spinosaurs had them because they would do nothing in the water other than get wet and annoy the dinosaur unless they were like duck feathers and kept the dinosaur warm and dry. Ornithomimids probably had them, as well as the therizinosaurs and a few other families had them as well. Maybe not the first dinosaurs, as that's when they were branching off from reptiles, but still, it's possible that all dinosaurs, including sauropods, had some feathers somewhere. Maybe not probable, but possible. One example is humans. If some futuristic race discovers a skin impression of our elbow hundreds of millions of years from now they're not going to know we had hair on our heads or anywhere else for that matter because they won't be able to see that in an elbow impression. They'll probably use other primates as an example and depict us as really hairy like my grandpa.

Too much meat for a single Allosaurus. God Job, I would like to have those skills and I'm excited for the next.

Good read as always, I would like to make suggestions but I'm a bit noob in this kind of thread.

The bird- dinosaur relation is still vibrant today. Infact, some birds still have the same hip joints as saurischians! Anyway, I think some dinosaurs had feathers, but I doubt that all dinosaurs had feathers. It does sound ridiculous

There have been several of those cases, mostly for big dinosaurs, and feathers for the little dinosaurs.

Probably just the smaller and more bird like dinosaurs had feathers. Haven't there been skin imprints discovered that shows dinosaurs had scales?

I think that some dinosaurs had feathers, like the smaller Dromeaosaurs, or the small bird-dinosaurs, and maybe a light covering for some of the juviniles of a limited amount of dinosaurs. But they mostly had scales.

That is a way of doing it Mr Happy.

Rex Fan, I just realized that Giganotosaurus has been found at 50 feet long, so I was wondering why you put it down as 46 feet long?

Time to check you're website. I have Rex Fans site bookmarked, then I just use the Want More Dinosaurs? thing.

Thanks Guys, and thanks to Mr. Happy I do realize that I forgot to announce the next creature is a Proterogyrinus.

Great job, I agree with Rex Fan, I don't think that they are as smart as you had them, but otherwise great job. I really liked how Henry teamed up with Darla, and then the betrayal, I was pleasantly surprise.

This was pretty good, much like all of them. So which creature is next? Knowing the voting is cancelled.

Helps get the action going as quickly as possible ;)

Ya they were pretty big as newborns, about a foot long, but they were pretty big creatures too. Just felt right

Pretty good. I will say I don't think that fish that ancient were that smart. Plus they were pretty big when they were just born it seems. But overall, pretty good.

I classify super predator based on size as well and something that has no predators of it's own either.

I think the ingen files are the best way to introduce a dinosaur. Gives it the feeling that you are reading a recounting of someone who went back in time and saw these dinosaurs for themselves.

I like ingein files. Great fight too!

I forgot about that. Spino and Carchar could ignore each other due to the difference in diet, but I'm not sure about Bahariasaurus and Sauroniops (don't know much about them).

I would have said that but I thought of the Spinosaurus-Bahariasaurus-Carcharodontosaurus-Sauroniops situation, all of which were 40+ foot predators that lived at the same time in the same place.

I enjoy doing the InGen files. It lets me add some degree of personality and history to the dinosaurs.

The InGen files are great. I really enjoyed this battle.

I like Makaveli's definition. I would have worded it different and said "A super predator is at the top of the food chain".

Thanks! :D

Hmm... Sounds like a good definition.

Super predators are carnivore swith no predators of their own.

Of course not :) great fight. I think this one is even better than the last.

I classify it as something higher in ranking than an apex predator. I see a super predator as at least 36 feet long and 4 tons, something that could take prey as large as itself or larger. Anything from Ekrixinatosaurus to Tyrannosaurus to Spinosaurus, no matter what their primary diet was, as long as they could take a large animal without the help of a pack. Not my exact definition, but it's what comes to mind.