Comments (Page 430)

i agree with carnosaur.

Well, there are some people who seem to think otherwise. 

I agree with Rex Fan. 

That's fine Raptor. Think what you want. 

Everyone, I'm not saying this to get anyone mad. But, I think we've beaten this topic to death. It was a good debate(no insults thrown or anything). But I think it is time to slow down a bit, move on you know? Sound good? I enjoyed this debate overall. Pretty good in light of recent things and such :)

I simply said that anyone can change anything in Wikipedia. For the most part, it's random people. The general public. Once this is discovered by the general public, there will be changes to it. 

Actually, Wikipedia sets it so only certain peopel can edit. If they see you are unreliable to edit articles, they IP block you.

I was talking to Mr. Happy. How I see it, Spinosaurs was the biggest theropod, but hey, that's just me.

Specify who you're talking to please so we know who needs to respond.

Personally, I said many things in general take a while to change. Wikipedia can be changed by anyone and, while it doesn't go into great detail about it, the 2014 model/specimen is mentioned.

Yeah, What S-Rex said... You contradicted yourself right there, to be honest...

Depends on who's running it. And technically, it does mention the 2014 specimen/model.

Depends on when the general public learns about the new finds. 

On top of the fact you just said it gets changed numerously? Ha, walked yourself into that.

Are you implying it takes years for a Wikipedia article to change!!??

And TK, actually, I didn't. When I first saw it, I dismissed it as just "another model." What I didn't know was there was an actual skeleton. Then I considered it and found it likely.

Can take years for things to change. 

Yet you guys immediately pounced on the idea of spino being a quadruped. Didn't bother think about it much.

Many species are known for several years before they even enter the public light.

It's been 2... months... Which approximately means 60 nights...

Because JP3 and Monsters Resurrected were well backed up, their the real deal, Eh? As Rex Fan said, things don't change overnight. It can takes, days, weeks, months or even years for things to change. 

Ok, TK, I do remember them saying they used some from Suchomimus to fill in the model, but that's done with many species and it's not given a second thought. It was mostly to fill in minor gaps and such.

Actually, because it's new. Things just don't change overnight.

No, they stated that they used several bones from another spinosaurid(suchomimus).

Yea, "mentions" it. It doesnt drop its current data and change it to the new one, you know why? Because its poorly backed up!

And TK, it's not. They have a Spinosaurus skeleton that's 40 percent complete. They digitally added Stromers, along with isolated finds, and it increased to 60 percent.

You realize how often those results are updated? Heck, even Wikipedia mentions the 2014 model/skeleton.

I get my onfo the same way dpino rex does. And rex fan out of sheer curiosity why do you think it is accurate for the spino recobstruction to be made up if suchomimus bones? When they clearly are so different?

Wikipedia is a great source for base information. However, anyone can edit it to say anything, so I wouldn't trust it too much. It's great for general info. 

Google, Bing, Yahoo, the most occupied of all search engines, and which ones are always at the top? Ones that support my theory. I dont go to the 100th page of the search to find my assumptions.

spinosaurus would have used it's huge,powerful arms with huge claws and teeth meant to seal the fate of any poor animal dumb enough to get in the way. that is not gracile,puny,or a weak worm.

I'd say giant sawfish and sharks would be dangerous wouldn't you?

Where exactly do you go to research?

Yea, and most places i go to research on what i have to say. And that isnt evidence, its a theory. And "dangerous fish"? Oooohhhhhh... Spino has something to worry about now...

And TK, out of sheer curiousity, I ask for sources :D

well i say 10 tons on average. and in isnt THAT gracile.

I would call this animal a terror of the water...

You can say your opinion is educated, we can say the same for ours. Just because you openly state it's "educated," doesn't mean we aren't going to disagree.

Downgrade it? I'm simply presenting what the current evidence shows. It shows an animal in the range of 15 meters in length that tipped the scales at around 6-7 tons. Spinosaurus was a unique, aquatic predator that specialized in a diet of large(and dangerous fish) and crocodiles.

Need i say my old saying? Or are you just going to allow me to say my educated opinions against your countless attempts to downgrade this animal?

Perhaps not very often, but it'd use them any chance it got. 

Weak worm? No, I don't think so. Spinosaurus was a giant that outweighed an elephant and took on crocodiles and sharks in it's watery habitat.