Comments (Page 1,003)

HELLO BREED = GET BORN,GROW UP,MATE,GIVE BIRTH CYCLE OF LIFE!!!!!!!!!!>:(

@Rexyfan, umm, I never said that spinosaurus had jaws that were as powerful as carcharodontosaurus… But even then, carcharodontosaurus still had relatively weakish-built jaws, as I just pointed out. You are getting overall robusticity and jaw strength mixed up; they are not the same thing. Both carcharodontosaurus and spinosaurus lacked in exceptional biting power most likely, because they did not need it (spinosaurus would have killed large animals probably with the combination of its at least decently vertically resistant rostrum and specialized puncturing dentition, and carcharodontosaurus likely killed using vertical and backward ripping techniques).

But spinosaurus still had generally stronger-constructed jaws and more robust dentition than carcharodontosaurus, as its skull lacked the visible large fenestrae present in that of carcharodontosaurus and its teeth were till very sturdy and were built like erect spikes as opposed to thin steak-knives

NO its ALL of them made in to one dino (obviosley!)

Sounds cool, and .... I can't wait!

XD

I know. Like in TLW raptors, it would be different and beautiful.

Nope. It doesn't actually give a specific time of year, just that it is the year 2020 and............... you can wait.

Thanks Rex Fan.

 Never thought of that. That would be good to see too.

Dilo, and colour changes due sex switching.

I have a hard time believing that too. Let's get out of the who's biased thing, alright? It's not getting us anywhere, and it's a waste of time.

Im trying to be nice, don't tick me off, I won't put up with it.

I mean only and ONLY Mosasaur.

Other than the Dilo, not much change in the dinosaurs I hope

Then they wil have alot of sues going on there at universal. Plus the only time a trike v.s. rex battle only happened in the games. It would be nice to see a movie battle. Also mabye the old dinos eat the herbivores but the new dino ( and raptors of course) will focus on the humans for some reason. mabye one of the humans stole something from the dinos like Billy in JP 3. Also why they only said a new villan, they didn't say they wouldn't add new dinos. just a new villan. Herrasaurus? probably messed up that name

Great fight. I was rooting for Deinonychus.

when you mean 1 species, do you mean one more, or do are you saying instead of having a roam around with 6 species, mow it's one species with a building/ also here's some pics.

Thanks Gojira2K

Godzillasaurus, I clearly said I was NOT biased. I simply have a hard time believing these jaws...

Could exert pressure much higher than these jaws...

PS- I had made a top 10 highest bite forces list a while ago where I listed Spinosaurus at number 5, so try to call me biased now!

Quote: And I do not agree on Spino\'s rostrum being more robust than that of Carcharodontosaurus, for starters.

-Carcharodontosaurus in general actually possessed a very lightly-built rostrum that was relatively narrow (it was exceptionally deep but lacked in any particular especial width) and was poorly adapted for gripping (the same thing goes for its teeth as well). It possessed a very surplus amount of large bodied fenestrae unlike spinosaurus which had a particularly denser and more heavily-constructed. Size or shape =/= robusticity, as spinosaurus\' thin and specialized piscivorous snout and dentition was probably not that weak at all, contrary to popular belief. The depth that is present in carcharodontosaurus\' rostrum along with its overall robust icing implies that it killed vertically and the laterally compressed profile of its teeth tell us that they were irresistant to lateral stress and only worked well in pulling and vertical actions.

Spinosaurus, however, was far better designed for gripping functions in its teeth and jaws; they faired far better in the resistance needed when catching large and powerful fish by comparison. Carcharodontosaurus was an adapted macropredator, but spinosaurus possessed a far more adept snout and tooth morphology that allowed for high resistance brought up my gripping.

And tyrannosaurus has a rough biting force at around 6 tons (roughly). For spinosaurus to have a bite strength only 2 tons less than this would imply that it was better adapted for crushing than it really was and possessed a very well-structured cranium for such (it likely did not possess the strongest jaw muscles). Spinosaurus did not need such a powerful bite, nor would the lack of exceptional width in its jaws house it. One would expect it to have a very wide snout along with much blunter-pointed dentition, which it did not, if it was a specialized crusher. Its snout was probably quite strong in terms of general balanced strength, but certainly not in terms of being well adapted for crushing

Intriguing.

Very interesting. Also Spino is actually my favorite dinosaur above all, but T-Rex would be my second, And Rex Fan, you're lucky you have a Spino tooth, and 4 tons PSI is very reasonable.

Ok then, can't wait for it. There are going to be Santa Rexes perhaps? :)

Just kidding, haha.

I bet you do DinoSteve, not the Christmas fight though, only Rex Fan knows that one (he suggested it).

What would make you think I hate Spino? I saw 4 ton PSI as REASONABLE, you see it as 2 ton PSI. Rex Fan isn't biased, he does research, he knows what he's talking about, so he's not biased, just enforcing his opinion.

I think I know what are you talking about....

Thanks. I like to use the environment. You'll see that in a bonus fight, as well as a fight I have coming up on Wednesday.

Great fight. I like the Jeep crushing him touch.

Well, Godzillasaurus, they didn't intend that. No one of them hates Spino, on the contrary, is one of our favourite dinosaurs. So neither RexFan, MrHappy, or me hate Spino or think it "DROOLS!".

I can be sure on this, we're not trying anyway to start another Spino/Rex debate, on the contrary, again, we kinda try to avoid that. ;)

I often agree with them, that's what I meant.

And I do not agree on Spino's rostrum being more robust than that of Carcharodontosaurus, for starters. On the rest, I kind of agree with everything.

Sweet, can't wait. So sometime between now and the end of the month

We'll see what happens. Anyway, Chapter Two will be delayed. My computer isn't working that good and I have to use my laptop. It will come out in the time preiod from Dec. 23-Dec. 31

Quote: You say facts Godzillasaurus. We can\'t say facts. There are very few \"facts\" in paleontology. 99 percent of everything said is opinions and theories. -Well then I am sorry. I typed too fast

Quote: As far as it\'s teeth go, Spinosaurus\' teeth were very straight. Great for grasping, but not tearing(I happen to own my own Spinosaurus tooth and I study it extensively)…

-That is what I said…  Even though they were not necessarily designed for killing (they were not particularly enlarged, but yet their shape made penetration efficient.

Quote: There are basically three tooth designs. Gripping(Spinosaurus), slashing/tearing(Allosaurus), and crushing(Tyrannosaurus). Crushing teeth stand up to pressure the best, conical(gripping) second best, and slashing third.

-Resistance is not determined by the actual function of the teeth necessarily. But rather their actual robusticity and overall thickness. Spinosaurus general dentition shape was like that of an elongated and conical spike, most adept at piercing deeply into the hide of a prey animal and retaining a stable grip afterwards when struggling with a fish (hence why I also do not think that it was that weak...). BUT that does not mean that they were weak? Heck no! The conical shape is what allows them to grip; thinner-edged dentition would likely fracture too easily.

Quote: In the end, Spinosaurus did not have weak jaws, but they really weren\'t anything special(except for their shape).

-True. But they were designed for fishing, along with its overall dentition shape. It was special and unique in that regard, as is the spinosaurinae subfamily, and spinosauridae as a whole

That would be interesting, and creepy, and JP Velociraptor like. Let's see Dinosaurus for what they are, living things. Imagine if the producers and writers and even director could see what we are posting. We've got movie material on this forum if you ask me.

Haha, full of *sudden realizations* so far. :D

Wow, that would create a thrill feeling... it would be awesome. Carnivores interested in only and ONLY humans.

That's what a JP Velociraptor would do. 

Great fight. The can was a nice touch, and I like how the Jeep lastly killed the Dilo.

Great job! ;)

*another sudden realization* What if some not important characters are intrigued by a herbivore, and the a carnivore eats them. Then, they high five and the herbivore continues eating while the carnivore lies in wait. That's theme park monsters.

Rex vs. Trike is always cool. That would be very nice.

That would be nice to see. Maybe trike could have a little more screen time (saving the cast from Rexy perhaps, then we get some Rex vs Trike action).

We're in the hands of admins :D

That's true. And it's kinda annoying when it happens. But here are some interesting thoughts.

Yes. Until someone breaks loose... ;)

Well, that's Jurassic Park. I hope they will include more herbivore screen-time, as well as carnivores behaving naturally.

I know. 

*Sudden realization* God help us when the noobs start posting on Rex vs Spino and start acting like they know more than us.

It would be interesting. It could show dinosaurs hunting and feeding naturally, and show them for what they are, not theme park monsters.